Sustainable development goals and firm carbon emissions: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China

被引:75
作者
Liu, Xiaoguang [1 ]
Ji, Qiang [2 ,3 ]
Yu, Jian [4 ]
机构
[1] Renmin Univ China, Natl Acad Dev & Strategy, Beijing 100872, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Sci, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[4] Cent Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Sustainable economic development goal; Five-year plan; Energy intensity; Carbon emission reduction; Energy transition; Difference-in-differences; ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATION; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; CO2; EMISSIONS; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; CLIMATE POLICY; PRODUCTIVITY; GREEN; CONSUMPTION; INVESTMENT; INFRASTRUCTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105627
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Using a difference-in-differences approach, this paper investigates the impact of changes in China's sustainable economic development goals on the energy conservation and emissions reductions behavior of Chinese firms. On average, incorporating emissions reduction targets into the long-term development plans produced significant effects in terms of energy conservation and emissions reduction, reducing energy consumption intensity between 2008 and 2011 by 1.39% and carbon emission intensity by 2.37%. The effects were mainly achieved through two long-term mechanisms, namely, optimizing energy consumption structure and increasing investment in green technologies. Both reflect firms' preference to take long-term measures rather than temporary ones. We also found that non-state-owned firms, firms without government financial subsidies, and firms with high external financing dependence, put more effort into reducing their carbon emissions in order to comply with the adjusted goals.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ENERGY, V2
[2]   How does environmental regulation affect production location of non-carbon ecological footprint? [J].
Asici, Ahmet Atil ;
Acar, Sevil .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 178 :927-936
[3]   Big Bad Banks? The Winners and Losers from Bank Deregulation in the United States [J].
Beck, Thorsten ;
Levine, Ross ;
Levkov, Alexey .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2010, 65 (05) :1637-1667
[4]   Who Really Benefits from Consumption Tax Cuts? Evidence from a Large VAT Reform in France [J].
Benzarti, Youssef ;
Carloni, Dorian .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-ECONOMIC POLICY, 2019, 11 (01) :38-63
[5]   Does environmental regulation affect energy efficiency in China's thermal power generation? Empirical evidence from a slacks-based DEA model [J].
Bi, Gong-Bing ;
Song, Wen ;
Zhou, P. ;
Liang, Liang .
ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 66 :537-546
[6]   Can direct environmental regulation promote green technology innovation in heavily polluting industries? Evidence from Chinese listed companies [J].
Cai, Xiang ;
Zhu, Bangzhu ;
Zhang, Haijing ;
Li, Liang ;
Xie, Meiying .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 746
[7]   Do carbon emission trading schemes stimulate green innovation in enterprises? Evidence from China [J].
Chen, Zhongfei ;
Zhang, Xiao ;
Chen, Fanglin .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2021, 168
[8]   The impact of green energy infrastructure on firm productivity: Evidence from the Three Gorges Project in China [J].
Cheng, Dong ;
Shi, Xunpeng ;
Yu, Jian .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2021, 71 :385-406
[9]   Exporting and electricity consumption: new microeconomic evidence from manufacturing firms in China [J].
Cheng, Dong ;
Yu, Jian ;
Zhang, Hanyuan .
APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2021, 28 (14) :1226-1233
[10]   Decomposing the decoupling of CO2 emissions and economic growth in Brazil [J].
de Freitas, Luciano Charlita ;
Kaneko, Shinji .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 70 (08) :1459-1469