Accurate modelling of the retention behaviour of peptides in gradient-elution hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography

被引:25
作者
Roca, Liana S. [1 ,2 ]
Schoemaker, Suzan E. [1 ]
Pirok, Bob W. J. [1 ,2 ]
Gargano, Andrea F. G. [1 ,2 ]
Schoenmakers, Peter J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Vant Hoff Inst Mol Sci, Sci Pk 904, NL-1098 XH Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Ctr Analyt Sci Amsterdam, Sci Pk 904, NL-1098 XH Amsterdam, Netherlands
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”; 欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
HILIC; Retention modelling; Bottom-up proteomics; Mass spectrometry; PEAK SHAPE; SEPARATION; PHASE; OPTIMIZATION; PREDICTION; MUDPIT;
D O I
10.1016/j.chroma.2019.460650
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The applicability of models to describe peptide retention in hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) was investigated. A tryptic digest of bovine-serum-albumin (BSA) was used as a test sample. Several different models were considered, including adsorption, mixed-mode, exponential, quadratic and Neue-Kuss models. Gradient separations were performed on three different HILIC stationary-phases under three different mobile-phase conditions to obtain model parameters. Methods to track peaks for specific peptides across different chromatograms are shown to be essential. The optimal mobile-phase additive for the separation of BSA digest on each of the three columns was selected by considering the retention window, peak width and peak intensity with mass-spectrometric detection. The performance of the models was investigated using the Akaike information criterion (AIC) to measure the goodness-of-fit and evaluated using prediction errors. The F-test for regression was applied to support model selection. RPLC separations of the same sample,were used to test the models. The adsorption model showed the best performance for all the HILIC columns investigated and the lowest prediction errors for two of the three columns. In most cases prediction errors were within 1%. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Aebersold R., 2003, NATURE, V422, P01511, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4939-7804-5_9., DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7804-5_9]
[2]   NEW LOOK AT STATISTICAL-MODEL IDENTIFICATION [J].
AKAIKE, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1974, AC19 (06) :716-723
[3]   HYDROPHILIC-INTERACTION CHROMATOGRAPHY FOR THE SEPARATION OF PEPTIDES, NUCLEIC-ACIDS AND OTHER POLAR COMPOUNDS [J].
ALPERT, AJ .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY, 1990, 499 :177-196
[4]   Prediction of peptide retention at different HPLC conditions from multiple linear regression models [J].
Baczek, T ;
Wiczling, P ;
Marszall, M ;
Vander Heyden, Y ;
Kaliszan, R .
JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH, 2005, 4 (02) :555-563
[5]   Evaluation and optimization of ZIC-HILIC-RP as an alternative MudPIT strategy [J].
Boersema, Paul J. ;
Divecha, Nullin ;
Heck, Albert J. R. ;
Mohammed, Shabaz .
JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH, 2007, 6 (03) :937-946
[6]  
Box G., 2005, Statistics for Experimenters, VSecond
[7]  
Carr D., 2002, The Handbook of Analysis and Purification of Peptides and Proteins by Reversed-Phase HPLC, DOI [10.1109/MAP.1972.27137., DOI 10.1109/MAP.1972.27137]
[8]   Comparison of isocratic retention models for hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatographic separation of native and fluorescently labeled oligosaccharides [J].
Cesla, Petr ;
Vankova, Nikola ;
Krenkova, Jana ;
Fischer, Jan .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2016, 1438 :179-188
[9]   Orthogonality of separation in two-dimensional liquid chromatography [J].
Gilar, M ;
Olivova, P ;
Daly, AE ;
Gebler, JC .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2005, 77 (19) :6426-6434
[10]   Retention behavior of peptides in hydrophilic-interaction chromatography [J].
Gilar, Martin ;
Jaworski, Aleksander .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2011, 1218 (49) :8890-8896