Challenges and Opportunities for UAV-Based Digital Elevation Model Generation for Flood-Risk Management: A Case of Princeville, North Carolina

被引:73
作者
Hashemi-Beni, Leila [1 ]
Jones, Jeffery [1 ]
Thompson, Gary [2 ]
Johnson, Curt [2 ]
Gebrehiwot, Asmamaw [1 ]
机构
[1] North Carolina A&T State Univ, Geomat Program, Dept Built Environm, Greensboro, NC 27411 USA
[2] Geodet Survey, North Carolina Emergency Management, Raleigh, NC 27699 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
UAV; 3D flood mapping; remote sensing; digital elevation model; 3D modeling; UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE; LOW-COST; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; ACCURACY; QUALITY; TOOL;
D O I
10.3390/s18113843
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Among the different types of natural disasters, floods are the most devastating, widespread, and frequent. Floods account for approximately 30% of the total loss caused by natural disasters. Accurate flood-risk mapping is critical in reducing such damages by correctly predicting the extent of a flood when coupled with rain and stage gage data, supporting emergency-response planning, developing land use plans and regulations with regard to the construction of structures and infrastructures, and providing damage assessment in both spatial and temporal measurements. The reliability and accuracy of such flood assessment maps is dependent on the quality of the digital elevation model (DEM) in flood conditions. This study investigates the quality of an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-based DEM for spatial flood assessment mapping and evaluating the extent of a flood event in Princeville, North Carolina during Hurricane Matthew. The challenges and problems of on-demand DEM production during a flooding event were discussed. An accuracy analysis was performed by comparing the water surface extracted from the UAV-derived DEM with the water surface/stage obtained using the nearby US Geologic Survey (USGS) stream gauge station and LiDAR data.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Adikari Y., GLOBAL TRENDS INWATE
[2]   Generation of accurate digital elevation models from UAV acquired low percentage overlapping images [J].
Ajayi, Oluibukun Gbenga ;
Salubi, Akporode Anthony ;
Angbas, Alu Fredrick ;
Odigure, Mukwedeh Godfrey .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 38 (8-10) :3113-3134
[3]   Flood risk analyses-how detailed do we need to be? [J].
Apel, H. ;
Aronica, G. T. ;
Kreibich, H. ;
Thieken, A. H. .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2009, 49 (01) :79-98
[4]   High-quality image matching and automated generation of 3D tree models [J].
Baltsavias, E. ;
Gruen, A. ;
Eisenbeiss, H. ;
Zhang, L. ;
Waser, L. T. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2008, 29 (05) :1243-1259
[5]   Classification of Aerial Photogrammetric 3D Point Clouds [J].
Becker, C. ;
Rosinskaya, E. ;
Hani, N. ;
d'Angelo, E. ;
Strecha, C. .
PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 84 (05) :287-295
[6]  
Coakley R., 2013, Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens., VXL-1/W2, P27
[7]   Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: A review [J].
Colomina, I. ;
Molina, P. .
ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2014, 92 :79-97
[8]   Lightweight UAV digital elevation models and orthoimagery for environmental applications: data accuracy evaluation and potential for river flood risk modelling [J].
Coveney, Seamus ;
Roberts, Kenneth .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 38 (8-10) :3159-3180
[9]  
Elsharkawy A.S., 2016, P INT ARCH PHOT REM
[10]   Calibration and accuracy assessment in a direct georeferencing system for UAS photogrammetry [J].
Gabrlik, Petr ;
la Cour-Harbo, Anders ;
Kalvodova, Petra ;
Zalud, Ludek ;
Janata, Premysl .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 39 (15-16) :4931-4959