A Contribution to Scientific Creativity: A Validation Study Measuring Divergent Problem Solving Ability

被引:18
作者
Aschauer, Wolfgang [1 ]
Haim, Kurt [1 ]
Weber, Christoph [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Educ Upper Austria, Linz, Austria
关键词
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS; OF-FIT INDEXES; FACTORIAL INVARIANCE; THINKING TESTS; FIGURAL FORM; CONSTRUCT; PERFORMANCE; QUOTIENT; VALIDITY; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1080/10400419.2021.1968656
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Creativity in science education and research on scientific creativity are becoming increasingly significant. Several domain-specific assessment tools focusing on different aspects of scientific creativity have been developed. Some of these tools consider a wide range of aspects, while others focus on very specific science-related aspects, thereby lacking an explicit focus on problem solving. Therefore, the authors developed the novel divergent problem solving ability in science test (DPAS) to assess students' potential to design different possible solutions for a particular scientific problem. The test was created as an outcome measure in intervention studies. It consists of two subtests and 13 subject-specific items. This study aims to broadly assess the construct validity and reliability of the DPAS and investigate the factorial longitudinal invariance and group invariance (group receiving interventions aimed at fostering divergent problem solving vs. control group) of the DPAS. Using data from 1,106 secondary school students from Austria, we found support for the construct validity and reliability of the DPAS scores. Moreover, we established robust longitudinal and group invariance of the DPAS, demonstrating its suitability for intervention studies.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 212
页数:18
相关论文
共 117 条
[1]   What Should People Be Told When They Take a Divergent Thinking Test? A Meta-Analytic Review of Explicit Instructions for Divergent Thinking [J].
Acar, Selcuk ;
Runco, Mark A. ;
Park, Hyeri .
PSYCHOLOGY OF AESTHETICS CREATIVITY AND THE ARTS, 2020, 14 (01) :39-49
[2]   The moderating influence of idea sequence: A re-analysis of the relationship between category switch and latency [J].
Acar, Selcuk ;
Runco, Mark A. ;
Ogurlu, Uzeyir .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2019, 142 :214-217
[3]   Estimating Creativity with a Multiple-Measurement Approach Within Scientific and Artistic Domains [J].
Agnoli, Sergio ;
Corazza, Giovanni E. ;
Runco, Mark A. .
CREATIVITY RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2016, 28 (02) :171-176
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, CAMBRIDGE HDB CREATI
[5]   Creative Cognition in Secondary Science: An exploration of divergent thinking in science among adolescents [J].
Antink-Meyer, Allison ;
Lederman, Norman G. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2015, 37 (10) :1547-1563
[6]   The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration [J].
Autor, DH ;
Levy, F ;
Murnane, RJ .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2003, 118 (04) :1279-1333
[7]   Objective measure of scientific creativity: Psychometric validity of the Creative Scientific Ability Test [J].
Ayas, M. Bahadir ;
Sak, Ugur .
THINKING SKILLS AND CREATIVITY, 2014, 13 :195-205
[8]   The generality-specificity of creativity: Exploring the structure of creative potential with EPoC [J].
Barbot, Baptiste ;
Besancon, Maud ;
Lubart, Todd .
LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2016, 52 :178-187
[9]   Predicting Scientific Creativity: The Role of Adversity, Collaborations, and Work Strategies [J].
Barrett, Jamie D. ;
Vessey, William B. ;
Griffith, Jennifer A. ;
Mracek, Derek ;
Mumford, Michael D. .
CREATIVITY RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2014, 26 (01) :39-52
[10]  
BARRON FRANK, 1955, JOUR ABNORMAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOL, V51-31, P478, DOI 10.1037/h0048073