Genetic algorithm based optimal sensor placement for L1-regularized damage detection

被引:53
作者
Hou, Rongrong [1 ]
Xia, Yong [1 ]
Xia, Qi [1 ]
Zhou, Xiaoqing [2 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Shenzhen Univ, Coll Civil Engn, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
damage detection; genetic algorithm; l(1) regularization; mutual coherence; sensor placement; STRUCTURAL DAMAGE; PARAMETRIC IDENTIFICATION; SIGNAL RECONSTRUCTION; FREQUENCY; LOCALIZATION; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1002/stc.2274
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Sparse recovery theory has been applied to damage detection by utilizing the sparsity feature of structural damage. The theory requires that the columns of the sensing matrix suffice certain independence criteria. In l(1)-regularized damage detection, the sensitivity matrix serves as the sensing matrix and is directly related to sensor locations. An optimal sensor placement technique is proposed such that the resulting sensitivity matrix is of the maximum independence in the columns or is of the least mutual coherence. Given a total number of sensors, the selection of sensor locations is a combinatorial problem. A genetic algorithm is thus used to solve this optimization problem, in which the mutual coherence of the sensitivity matrix is minimized. The obtained optimal sensor locations and associated sensitivity matrix are used in l(1)-regularized damage detection. An experimental cantilever beam and a three-storey frame are utilized to verify the effectiveness and reliability of the proposed sensor placement technique. Results show that using the modal data based on the optimal sensor placement can identify damage location and severity more accurately than using the ones based on uniformly selected sensor locations.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1989, GENETIC ALGORITHMS S
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, REV STRUCTURAL HLTH
[3]   Emerging data technology in structural health monitoring: Compressive sensing technology [J].
Bao Y. ;
Li H. ;
Ou J. .
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, 2014, 4 (02) :77-90
[4]  
Boyd Stephen P., 2014, Convex Optimization
[5]  
Candes E.J. etal, 2006, INT C MATH, V3, P1433, DOI DOI 10.4171/022-3/69
[6]   Robust uncertainty principles:: Exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information [J].
Candès, EJ ;
Romberg, J ;
Tao, T .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, 2006, 52 (02) :489-509
[7]   Decoding by linear programming [J].
Candes, EJ ;
Tao, T .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, 2005, 51 (12) :4203-4215
[8]   Stiffness identification and damage localization via differential evolution algorithms [J].
Casciati, Sara .
STRUCTURAL CONTROL & HEALTH MONITORING, 2008, 15 (03) :436-449
[9]   Damage localization in a cable-stayed bridge via bio-inspired metaheuristic tools [J].
Casciati, Sara ;
Elia, Lorenzo .
STRUCTURAL CONTROL & HEALTH MONITORING, 2017, 24 (05)
[10]  
Chang M, 2014, J BRIDG ENG ASCE, V19