Timed Up and Go test: Comparison of kinematics between patients with chronic stroke and healthy subjects

被引:20
|
作者
Bonnyaud, Celine [1 ]
Pradon, Didier [1 ]
Vaugier, Isabelle [2 ]
Vuillerme, Nicolas [3 ,4 ]
Bensmail, Djamel [5 ]
Roche, Nicolas [1 ]
机构
[1] Hop Raymond Poincare, AP HP, Serv Physiol & Explorat Fonct,UVSQ, INSERM,U1179,Team Technol & Innovat Therapies App, F-92380 Garches, France
[2] Hop Raymond Poincare, AP HP, INSERM, CIC 1429, Garches, France
[3] Univ Grenoble Alpes, Lab AGIM, La Tronche, France
[4] Inst Univ France, Paris, France
[5] Hop Raymond Poincare, AP HP, Serv Med Phys & Readaptat,UVSQ, INSERM,U1179,Team Technol & Innovat Therapies App, Garches, France
关键词
Hemiparesis; Oriented-gait; Assessment; Motor control; Performance; GAIT; COORDINATION; IMPAIRMENTS; PEOPLE; ADJUSTMENTS; RELIABILITY; STRATEGIES; PARAMETERS; DIRECTION; OBSTACLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.06.023
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Understanding locomotor behavior is important to guide rehabilitation after stroke. This study compared lower-limb kinematics during the walking and turning sub-tasks of the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test in stroke patients and healthy subjects. We also determined the parameters which explain TUG sub-task performance time in healthy subjects. Biomechanical parameters were recorded during the TUG in standardized conditions in 25 healthy individuals and 29 patients with chronic stroke using a 3D motion analysis system. Parameters were compared between groups and a stepwise regression was used to indicate parameters which explained performance time in the healthy subjects. The percentage difference in step length between the last and first steps was calculated, during walking sub-tasks for each group. Speed, cadence, step length, percentage paretic single support phase, percentage non-paretic swing phase, peak hip extension, knee flexion and ankle dorsiflexion were significantly reduced in the Stroke group compared to the Healthy group (p < 0.05). In the Healthy group, step length and cadence explained 91% of variance for Go and 86% for Return (walking sub-tasks), and none of the parameters explained the Turn. Previous study in patients with stroke showed that the same parameters explained the variance during the walking sub-tasks and balance-related parameters explained the Turn. The present results showed that step length was differently modulated in each group. Thus the locomotor behavior of patients with stroke during obstacle circumvention is quite specific in light of the results obtained in healthy subjects. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:258 / 263
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Instrumented Timed "Up & Go" Test Distinguishes Turning Characteristics in Vestibular Hypofunction
    Kim, Kyoung Jae
    Gimmon, Yoav
    Millar, Jennifer
    Brewer, Kelly
    Serrador, Jorge
    Schubert, Michael C.
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2021, 101 (07):
  • [32] EFFECT OF SEAT HEIGHT AND TURNING DIRECTION ON THE TIMED UP AND GO TEST SCORES OF PEOPLE AFTER STROKE
    Heung, Thomas H. M.
    Ng, Shamay S. M.
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2009, 41 (09) : 719 - 722
  • [33] Reliability of the Timed Up and Go Test in Fibromyalgia
    Collado-Mateo, Daniel
    Dominguez-Munoz, Francisco J.
    Adsuar, Jose C.
    Merellano-Navarro, Eugenio
    Olivares, Pedro R.
    Gusi, Narcis
    REHABILITATION NURSING, 2018, 43 (01) : 35 - 39
  • [34] Evaluation of the psychometric properties and clinical applications of the Timed Up and Go test in Parkinson disease: a systematic review
    Mollinedo, Irimia
    Cancela, Jose Ma
    JOURNAL OF EXERCISE REHABILITATION, 2020, 16 (04) : 302 - 312
  • [35] Comparison of psychometric properties of the dual-task timed up-and-go test (cognitive) and the 3-m walk backward test in community-dwelling stroke patients
    Horata, Emel Tasvuran
    Eken, Fatma
    Taskin, Gulsen
    Kara, Guzin
    Yesil, Hilal
    Adar, Sevda
    Baskan, Emre
    Dundar, Uemit
    TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION, 2025, 32 (02) : 140 - 149
  • [36] Can an accelerometer enhance the utility of the Timed Up & Go Test when evaluating patients with Parkinson's disease?
    Weiss, Aner
    Herman, Talia
    Plotnik, Meir
    Brozgol, Marina
    Maidan, Inbal
    Giladi, Nir
    Gurevich, Tanya
    Hausdorff, Jeffrey M.
    MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2010, 32 (02) : 119 - 125
  • [37] Footsteps and walking trajectories during the Timed Up and Go test in young, older, and Parkinson's disease subjects
    Okada, Yohei
    Yorozu, Ayanori
    Fukumoto, Takahiko
    Morioka, Shu
    Shomoto, Koji
    Aoyama, Tomoki
    Takahashi, Masaki
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2021, 89 : 54 - 60
  • [38] Age-Related Changes in Mobility Evaluated by the Timed Up and Go Test Instrumented through a Single Sensor
    Mangano, Giulia R. A.
    Valle, Maria S.
    Casabona, Antonino
    Vagnini, Alessandro
    Cioni, Matteo
    SENSORS, 2020, 20 (03)
  • [39] Minimal Detectable Changes of the Berg Balance Scale, Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale, Timed "Up & Go" Test, Gait Speeds, and 2-Minute Walk Test in Individuals With Chronic Stroke With Different Degrees of Ankle Plantarflexor Tone
    Hiengkaew, Vimonwan
    Jitaree, Khanitha
    Chaiyawat, Pakaratee
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2012, 93 (07): : 1201 - 1208
  • [40] The relationship between Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Timed Up and Go test in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis
    Sabirli, Feride
    Paker, Nurdan
    Bugdayci, Derya
    RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 33 (10) : 2691 - 2694