Modeling the Financial Potential of Silvopasture Agroforestry in Eastern North Carolina and Northeastern Oregon

被引:15
作者
Bruck, Sonia R. [1 ]
Bishaw, Badege [1 ]
Cushing, Tamara L. [2 ]
Cubbage, Frederick W. [3 ]
机构
[1] Oregon State Univ, Dept Forest Ecosyst & Soc, 3180 SW Jefferson Way,208 Richardson Hall, Corvallis, OR 97330 USA
[2] Oregon State Univ, Dept Forest Engn Resources & Management, 3180 SW Jefferson Way,216 Richardson Hall, Corvallis, OR 97330 USA
[3] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Forestry & Environm Resources, Box 8008,2800 Faucette Blvd, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
关键词
silvopasture; capital budgeting; loblolly pine (Pinus taeda); longleaf pine (Pinus palustris); ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa); CARBON SEQUESTRATION; BENEFITS; PINE;
D O I
10.1093/jofore/fvy065
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Silvopasture is the planned and managed agroecosystem in which forage, livestock, and woody perennials are integrated "either simultaneously or sequentially on the same parcel of land." Silvopasture can help mitigate anthropogenic climate change through carbon sequestration in perennial vegetation. We examined silvopasture, forest, and pasture systems in eastern North Carolina and northeastern Oregon. In North Carolina, we evaluated forest and agroforestry systems using loblolly and longleaf pine species. In Oregon, we evaluated forest and agroforestry systems using ponderosa pine. We based the analyses on typical forest and cattle regimes, including yields, costs, and prices obtained from the literature, and consulted with experts in the respective subjects. The financial viability of land management investments was investigated using capital budgeting techniques. Cash flows were developed using 4 percent and 6 percent real discount rates. Analysis suggests loblolly pine timber management and cattle management are more profitable than silvopasture management in eastern North Carolina. Additionally, cattle management is more profitable than silvopasture in northeastern Oregon. Longleaf pine and ponderosa pine are not profitable when solely managed for timber and can benefit financially when combined with livestock.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 20
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Agroforestry development: An environmental economic perspective [J].
Alavalapati, JRR ;
Shrestha, RK ;
Stainback, GA ;
Matta, JR .
AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS, 2004, 61-2 (01) :299-310
[2]   Relating Quantity, Quality, and Value of Lumber to Planting Density for Loblolly Pine Plantations [J].
Amateis, Ralph L. ;
Burkhart, Harold E. .
SOUTHERN JOURNAL OF APPLIED FORESTRY, 2013, 37 (02) :97-101
[3]  
ANDERSON D., 2016, 12 ANN CATTL WORKSH
[4]  
BENSON G., 2013, BEEF COW CALF ESTIMA
[5]  
BISHAW B., 2002, RES CONTRIBUTION, V38
[6]  
BOWERS S., 2014, ALTERNATIVE INVESTME
[7]  
BRANDLE J. R., 2005, NEW VISTAS AGROFORES, P65
[8]  
CARROLL W. D., FOR ECOL MANAGE, V211, P150
[9]  
CASTILLO M., 2014, FORAGES N CAROLINA G
[10]   ECONOMIC-IMPLICATIONS OF SILVIPASTURES ON SOUTHERN PINE PLANTATIONS [J].
CLASON, TR .
AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS, 1995, 29 (03) :227-238