Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials show suboptimal validity of surrogate outcomes for overall survival in advanced colorectal cancer

被引:55
作者
Ciani, Oriana [1 ,2 ]
Buyse, Marc [3 ,4 ]
Garside, Ruth [5 ]
Peters, Jaime [1 ]
Saad, Everardo D. [6 ]
Stein, Ken [1 ]
Taylor, Rod S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Sch Med, Inst Hlth Res, Exeter EX2 4SG, Devon, England
[2] Bocconi Univ, Ctr Res Hlth & Social Care Management, I-20141 Milan, Italy
[3] Hasselt Univ, Interuniv Inst Biostat & Stat Bioinformat I BioSt, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
[4] IDDI, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[5] Univ Exeter, Sch Med, European Ctr Environm & Human Hlth, Knowledge Spa,Royal Cornwall Hosp, Truro TR1 3HD, England
[6] Dendrix Res, BR-04534000 Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
Surrogate outcome; Colorectal cancer; PFS; TTP; Tumor response; Health technology assessment; PROGRESSION-FREE SURVIVAL; CELL LUNG-CANCER; END-POINTS; CLINICAL-TRIALS; TUMOR RESPONSE; STATISTICAL-METHODS; EVALUATION SCHEMA; TIME; VALIDATION; BIOMARKERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.02.016
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: To quantify and compare the treatment effects on three surrogate end points, progression-free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP), and tumor response rate (TR) vs. overall survival (OS) based on a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of drug interventions in advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC). Study Design and Setting: We systematically searched for RCTs of pharmacologic therapies in aCRC between 2003 and 2013. Trial characteristics, risk of bias, and outcomes were recorded based on a predefined form. Univariate and multivariate random-effects meta-analyses were used to estimate pooled summary treatment effects. The ratio of hazard ratios (HRs)/odds ratios (ORs) and difference in medians were used to quantify the degree of difference in treatment effects on the surrogate end points and OS. Spearman rho, surrogate threshold effect (STE), and R-2 were also estimated across predefined trial-level covariates. Results: We included 101 RCTs. In univariate and multivariate meta-analyses, we found larger treatment effects for the surrogates than for OS. Compared with OS, treatment effects were on average 13% higher when HRs were measured and 3% to 45% higher when ORs were considered; differences in median PFS/TTP were higher than on OS by an average of 0.5 month. Spearman rho ranged from 0.39 to 0.80, mean R-2 from 0.06 to 0.65, and STE was 0.8 for HRPFS, 0.64 for HRTTP or 0.28 for ORTR. The stratified analyses revealed high variability across all strata. Conclusion: None of the end points in this study were found to achieve the level of evidence (ie, mean R-trial(2) > 0.60) that has been set to select high or excellent correlation levels by common surrogate evaluation tools. Previous surrogacy relationships observed between PFS and TTP vs. OS in selected settings may not apply across other classes or lines of therapy. (c) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:833 / 842
页数:10
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [21] Association between treatment effects on disease progression end points and overall survival in clinical studies of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma
    Delea, T. E.
    Khuu, A.
    Heng, D. Y. C.
    Haas, T.
    Soulieres, D.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 107 (07) : 1059 - 1068
  • [22] Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
    Egger, M
    Smith, GD
    Schneider, M
    Minder, C
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7109): : 629 - 634
  • [23] Time-dependent endpoints as predictors of overall survival in multiple myeloma
    Felix, Jorge
    Aragao, Filipa
    Almeida, Joao M.
    Calado, Frederico J. M.
    Ferreira, Diana
    Parreira, Antonio B. S.
    Rodrigues, Ricardo
    Rijo, Joao F. R.
    [J]. BMC CANCER, 2013, 13
  • [24] Tumor Response and Progression-Free Survival as Potential Surrogate Endpoints for Overall Survival in Extensive Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer Findings on the Basis of North Central Cancer Treatment Group Trials
    Foster, Nathan R.
    Qi, Yingwei
    Shi, Qian
    Krook, James E.
    Kugler, John W.
    Jett, James R.
    Molina, Julian R.
    Schild, Steven E.
    Adjei, Alex A.
    Mandrekar, Sumithra J.
    [J]. CANCER, 2011, 117 (06) : 1262 - 1271
  • [25] Surrogate endpoint validation: statistical elegance versus clinical relevance
    Green, E. M.
    Yothers, G.
    Sargent, Daniel J.
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2008, 17 (05) : 477 - 486
  • [26] Green Stephanie., 1997, Clinical Trials in Oncology
  • [27] Surrogate markers and survival in women receiving first-line combination anthracycline chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer
    Hackshaw, A
    Knight, A
    Barrett-Lee, P
    Leonard, R
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 93 (11) : 1215 - 1221
  • [28] A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints
    Harbord, Roger M.
    Egger, Matthias
    Sterne, Jonathan A. C.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2006, 25 (20) : 3443 - 3457
  • [29] Higgins J, 2008, Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions
  • [30] CONVINCING EVIDENCE FROM CONTROLLED AND UNCONTROLLED STUDIES ON THE LIPID-LOWERING EFFECT OF A STATIN
    Higgins, Julian
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2012, (12):