Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials show suboptimal validity of surrogate outcomes for overall survival in advanced colorectal cancer

被引:55
作者
Ciani, Oriana [1 ,2 ]
Buyse, Marc [3 ,4 ]
Garside, Ruth [5 ]
Peters, Jaime [1 ]
Saad, Everardo D. [6 ]
Stein, Ken [1 ]
Taylor, Rod S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Sch Med, Inst Hlth Res, Exeter EX2 4SG, Devon, England
[2] Bocconi Univ, Ctr Res Hlth & Social Care Management, I-20141 Milan, Italy
[3] Hasselt Univ, Interuniv Inst Biostat & Stat Bioinformat I BioSt, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
[4] IDDI, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[5] Univ Exeter, Sch Med, European Ctr Environm & Human Hlth, Knowledge Spa,Royal Cornwall Hosp, Truro TR1 3HD, England
[6] Dendrix Res, BR-04534000 Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
Surrogate outcome; Colorectal cancer; PFS; TTP; Tumor response; Health technology assessment; PROGRESSION-FREE SURVIVAL; CELL LUNG-CANCER; END-POINTS; CLINICAL-TRIALS; TUMOR RESPONSE; STATISTICAL-METHODS; EVALUATION SCHEMA; TIME; VALIDATION; BIOMARKERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.02.016
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: To quantify and compare the treatment effects on three surrogate end points, progression-free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP), and tumor response rate (TR) vs. overall survival (OS) based on a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of drug interventions in advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC). Study Design and Setting: We systematically searched for RCTs of pharmacologic therapies in aCRC between 2003 and 2013. Trial characteristics, risk of bias, and outcomes were recorded based on a predefined form. Univariate and multivariate random-effects meta-analyses were used to estimate pooled summary treatment effects. The ratio of hazard ratios (HRs)/odds ratios (ORs) and difference in medians were used to quantify the degree of difference in treatment effects on the surrogate end points and OS. Spearman rho, surrogate threshold effect (STE), and R-2 were also estimated across predefined trial-level covariates. Results: We included 101 RCTs. In univariate and multivariate meta-analyses, we found larger treatment effects for the surrogates than for OS. Compared with OS, treatment effects were on average 13% higher when HRs were measured and 3% to 45% higher when ORs were considered; differences in median PFS/TTP were higher than on OS by an average of 0.5 month. Spearman rho ranged from 0.39 to 0.80, mean R-2 from 0.06 to 0.65, and STE was 0.8 for HRPFS, 0.64 for HRTTP or 0.28 for ORTR. The stratified analyses revealed high variability across all strata. Conclusion: None of the end points in this study were found to achieve the level of evidence (ie, mean R-trial(2) > 0.60) that has been set to select high or excellent correlation levels by common surrogate evaluation tools. Previous surrogacy relationships observed between PFS and TTP vs. OS in selected settings may not apply across other classes or lines of therapy. (c) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:833 / 842
页数:10
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] Statistics Notes - Interaction revisited: the difference between two estimates
    Altman, DG
    Bland, JM
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 326 (7382): : 219 - 219
  • [2] Poor correlation between progression-free and overall survival in modern clinical trials: Are composite endpoints the answer?
    Amir, Eitan
    Seruga, Bostjan
    Kwong, Ryan
    Tannock, Ian F.
    Ocana, Alberto
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 48 (03) : 385 - 388
  • [3] [Anonymous], IQWIG REP
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1979, WHO OFFS PUBL
  • [5] [Anonymous], STAT BIOL HLTH
  • [6] [Anonymous], BIOM J
  • [7] Armitage P., 2002, STAT METHODS MED RES, P187, DOI [10.1002/9780470773666.ch7, DOI 10.1002/9780470773666.CH7]
  • [8] The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Bucher, HC
    Guyatt, GH
    Griffith, LE
    Walter, SD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 50 (06) : 683 - 691
  • [9] Validation of surrogate end points in multiple randomized clinical trials with failure time end points
    Burzykowski, T
    Molenberghs, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS, 2001, 50 : 405 - 422
  • [10] Evaluation of tumor response, disease control, progression-free survival, and time to progression as potential surrogate end points in metastatic breast cancer
    Burzykowski, Tomasz
    Buyse, Marc
    Piccart-Gebhart, Martine J.
    Sledge, George
    Carmichael, James
    Lueck, Hans-Joachim
    Mackey, John R.
    Nabholtz, Jean-Marc
    Paridaens, Robert
    Biganzoli, Laura
    Jassem, Jacek
    Bontenbal, Marijke
    Bonneterre, Jacques
    Chan, Stephen
    Basaran, Gul Atalay
    Therasse, Patrick
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (12) : 1987 - 1992