Survival analysis of author keywords: An application to the library and information sciences area

被引:31
作者
Peset, F. [1 ]
Garzon-Farinos, F. [2 ]
Gonzalez, L. M. [3 ]
Garcia-Masso, X. [4 ]
Ferrer-Sapena, A. [1 ]
Toca-Herrera, J. L. [5 ]
Sanchez-Perez, E. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Valencia, Inst Univ Matemat Pura & Aplicada, Camino Vera S-N, E-46022 Valencia, Spain
[2] Univ Catolica Valencia San Vicente Martir, Quevedo 2, Valencia 46001, Spain
[3] Univ Valencia, Dept Educ Fis & Deporte, Gasco Oliag 3, Valencia 46010, Spain
[4] Univ Valencia, Dept Didact Expres Mus Plast & Corporal, Ave Naranjos 4, Valencia 46022, Spain
[5] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci, Inst Biophys, Dept Nanobiotechnol, Vienna, Austria
关键词
EVOLUTION; ARTICLES; BIBLIOMETRICS; INFORMETRICS; COCITATION; INTERNET; RANKING; IMPACT; TIME;
D O I
10.1002/asi.24248
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Our purpose is to adapt a statistical method for the analysis of discrete numerical series to the keywords appearing in scientific articles of a given area. As an example, we apply our methodological approach to the study of the keywords in the Library and Information Sciences (LIS) area. Our objective is to detect the new author keywords that appear in a fixed knowledge area in the period of 1 year in order to quantify the probabilities of survival for 10 years as a function of the impact of the journals where they appeared. Many of the new keywords appearing in the LIS field are ephemeral. Actually, more than half are never used again. In general, the terms most commonly used in the LIS area come from other areas. The average survival time of these keywords is approximately 3 years, being slightly higher in the case of words that were published in journals classified in the second quartile of the area. We believe that measuring the appearance and disappearance of terms will allow understanding some relevant aspects of the evolution of a discipline, providing in this way a new bibliometric approach.
引用
收藏
页码:462 / 473
页数:12
相关论文
共 72 条
[41]  
Neveol Aurelie, 2010, AMIA Annu Symp Proc, V2010, P537
[42]   A Study of Factors That Affect the Information-Seeking Behavior of Academic Scientists [J].
Niu, Xi ;
Hemminger, Bradley M. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 63 (02) :336-353
[43]   Scientific Utopia: II. Restructuring Incentives and Practices to Promote Truth Over Publishability [J].
Nosek, Brian A. ;
Spies, Jeffrey R. ;
Motyl, Matt .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2012, 7 (06) :615-631
[44]   Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: A systematic review of current approaches [J].
O'Mara-Eves A. ;
Thomas J. ;
McNaught J. ;
Miwa M. ;
Ananiadou S. .
Systematic Reviews, 4 (1)
[45]   Forty-Five Years of LIS Research Evolution, 1971–2015: An Informetrics Study of the Author-Supplied Keywords [J].
Onyancha O.B. .
Publishing Research Quarterly, 2018, 34 (3) :456-470
[46]  
Peset F., 2018, SUPPLEMENTARY MAT S5
[47]  
Peset F., 2018, SUPPLEMENTARY MAT S2
[48]  
Peset F., 2018, SUPPLEMENTARY MAT S1
[49]  
Peset F., 2018, SUPPLEMENTARY MAT S3
[50]  
Peset F., 2018, DATASET