Imaging Techniques for the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:131
作者
Chou, Roger
Cuevas, Carlos
Fu, Rongwei
Devine, Beth
Wasson, Ngoc
Ginsburg, Alexander
Zakher, Bernadette
Pappas, Miranda
Graham, Elaine
Sullivan, Sean D.
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Pacific Northwest Evidence Based Practice Ctr, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Ctr Comparat & Hlth Syst Effectiveness CHASE Alli, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Mayo Med Sch, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND; DOUBLE ARTERIAL-PHASE; FOCAL LIVER-LESIONS; GD-EOB-DTPA; DIGITAL-SUBTRACTION-ANGIOGRAPHY; HELICAL COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; C-ARM CT; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; MULTIDETECTOR CT;
D O I
10.7326/M14-2509
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Several imaging modalities are available for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Purpose: To evaluate the test performance of imaging modalities for HCC. Data Sources: MEDLINE (1998 to December 2014), the Co-chrane Library Database, Scopus, and reference lists. Study Selection: Studies on test performance of ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Data Extraction: One investigator abstracted data, and a second investigator confirmed them; 2 investigators independently assessed study quality and strength of evidence. Data Synthesis: Few studies have evaluated imaging for HCC in surveillance settings. In nonsurveillance settings, sensitivity for detection of HCC lesions was lower for ultrasonography without contrast than for CT or MRI (pooled difference based on direct comparisons, 0.11 to 0.22), and MRI was associated with higher sensitivity than CT (pooled difference, 0.09 [95% CI, 0.07 to 12]). For evaluation of focal liver lesions, there were no clear differences in sensitivity among ultrasonography with contrast, CT, and MRI. Specificity was generally 0.85 or higher across imaging modalities, but this item was not reported in many studies. Factors associated with lower sensitivity included use of an explanted liver reference standard, and smaller or more well-differentiated HCC lesions. For MRI, sensitivity was slightly higher for hepatic-specific than nonspecific contrast agents. Limitations: Only English-language articles were included, there was statistical heterogeneity in pooled analyses, and costs were not assessed. Most studies were conducted in Asia and had methodological limitations. Conclusion: CT and MRI are associated with higher sensitivity than ultrasonography without contrast for detection of HCC; sensitivity was higher for MRI than CT. For evaluation of focal liver lesions, the sensitivities of ultrasonography with contrast, CT, and MRI for HCC are similar.
引用
收藏
页码:697 / +
页数:41
相关论文
共 192 条
[1]   Accuracy of hepatocellular carcinoma detection on multidetector CT in a transplant liver population with explant liver correlation [J].
Addley, H. C. ;
Griffin, N. ;
Shaw, A. S. ;
Mannelli, L. ;
Parker, R. A. ;
Aitken, S. ;
Wood, H. ;
Davies, S. ;
Alexander, G. J. ;
Lomas, D. J. .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2011, 66 (04) :349-356
[2]   Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma by Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver MRI: Comparison with triple phase 64 detector row helical CT [J].
Akai, Hiroyuki ;
Kiryu, Shigeru ;
Matsuda, Izuru ;
Satou, Jirou ;
Takao, Hidemasa ;
Tajima, Taku ;
Watanabe, Yasushi ;
Imamura, Hiroshi ;
Kokudo, Norihiro ;
Akahane, Masaaki ;
Ohtomo, Kuni .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2011, 80 (02) :310-315
[3]   Usefulness of Combination of Imaging Modalities in the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Sonazoid®-Enhanced Ultrasound, Gadolinium Diethylene-Triamine-Pentaacetic Acid-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography [J].
Alaboudy, Alshimaa ;
Inoue, Tatsuo ;
Hatanaka, Kinuyo ;
Chung, Hobyung ;
Hyodo, Tomoko ;
Kumano, Seishi ;
Murakami, Takamichi ;
Moustafa, Ehab Fawzy Abdou ;
Kudo, Masatoshi .
ONCOLOGY, 2011, 81 :66-72
[4]   Dual-energy-CT of hypervascular liver lesions in patients with HCC: investigation of image quality and sensitivity [J].
Altenbernd, Jens ;
Heusner, Till A. ;
Ringelstein, Adrian ;
Ladd, Susanne C. ;
Forsting, Michael ;
Antoch, Gerald .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (04) :738-743
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, HEALTH TECHNOL ASSES, V17, P1, DOI 10.3310/hta17160
[6]   Comparison of clinical and pathological staging and long-term results of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in a single transplant center [J].
Baccarani, U. ;
Adani, G. L. ;
Avellini, C. ;
Lorenzin, D. ;
Curro, G. ;
Beltrami, A. ;
Pasqualucci, A. ;
Bresadola, V. ;
Risaliti, A. ;
Viale, P. L. ;
Beltrami, C. A. ;
Bresadola, F. .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 38 (04) :1111-1113
[7]   Hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver disease: A comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and multiphasic MDCT [J].
Baek, C. -K. ;
Choi, J. -Y. ;
Kim, K. -A. ;
Park, M. -S. ;
Lim, J. S. ;
Chung, Y. E. ;
Kim, M. -J. ;
Kim, K. -W. .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 67 (02) :148-156
[8]  
Barr RG, 2013, J ULTRAS MED, V32, P7
[9]   MnDPDP-enhanced MRI vs dual-phase spiral CT in the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis [J].
Bartolozzi, C ;
Donati, F ;
Cioni, D ;
Crocetti, L ;
Lencioni, R .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2000, 10 (11) :1697-1702
[10]   Liver transplantation in cirrhotic patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma: An analysis of pre-operative imaging, explant histology and prognostic histologic indicators [J].
Bhattacharjya, S ;
Bhattacharjya, T ;
Quaglia, A ;
Dhillon, AP ;
Burroughs, AK ;
Patch, DW ;
Tibballs, JM ;
Watkinson, AF ;
Rolles, K ;
Davidson, BR .
DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 21 (02) :152-159