Does the Electoral System Foster a Predominant Party System? Evidence from Turkey

被引:19
作者
Arslantas, Duzgun [1 ]
Arslantas, Senol [3 ]
Kaiser, Andre [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cologne, Cologne Ctr Comparat Polit, Cologne, Germany
[2] Univ Cologne, Cologne Ctr Comparat Polit, Comparat Polit, Cologne, Germany
[3] Istanbul Univ, Dept Polit Sci & Int Relat, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
AKP; dominant party; electoral system; electoral threshold; predominant party system; POLITICAL CONSEQUENCES; SPATIAL-ANALYSIS; AKP; NEOLIBERALISM; DISPROPORTIONALITY; DETERMINANTS; CLIENTELISM; TRANSITION; ELECTIONS; CLEAVAGES;
D O I
10.1111/spsr.12386
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
This paper discusses the role of the electoral system in making the Justice and Development Party (AKP) dominant. Drawing on Sartori's framework, we first clarify the concept of a predominant party system. Second, we examine the impact of the electoral system on the emergence of a predominant party system in Turkey. Analysing election results, we argue that the electoral system fosters dominance in three ways. First, a combination of electoral formula, national threshold and district threshold leads to over-representation of large parties and under-representation of small ones. Second, the fear of a wasted vote due to the high threshold prompts voters to support their second-best option, which concentrates the votes among large parties. Finally, the electoral system increases electoral turnout rates by extending polarization.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 143
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Party System Institutionalization and Economic Voting: Evidence from India [J].
Jensenius, Francesca R. ;
Suryanarayan, Pavithra .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2022, 84 (02) :814-830
[32]   Weak party system institutionalization and autocratization: evidence from Tunisia [J].
Mutlu, Bedirhan E. ;
Yasun, Salih .
DEMOCRATIZATION, 2025, 32 (02) :420-440
[34]   The Power of Vote Electoral Change and National Party System in Mexico 2018 [J].
Garrido, Sebastian ;
Freidenberg, Flavia .
POLITICA Y GOBIERNO, 2020, 27 (02)
[35]   ELECTORAL REFORM AND PARTY SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT IN JAPAN AND TAIWAN A Comparative Study [J].
Jou, Willy .
ASIAN SURVEY, 2009, 49 (05) :759-785
[36]   An aggregate analysis of the AKP vote and electoral continuities in the Turkish party system [J].
Kumbaracibasi, Arda Can .
TURKISH STUDIES, 2016, 17 (02) :223-250
[37]   The (Momentary) End of Two-Party System in Spain: Analysis of the Electoral Results of 2015 and 2016 [J].
Sanchez Munoz, Oscar .
REVISTA ESPANOLA DE DERECHO CONSTITUCIONAL, 2017, 37 (109) :237-260
[38]   The Italian electoral system: what the legislator does, the Court undoes [J].
Cecili, Marco .
REVISTA DE DERECHO POLITICO, 2019, (106) :265-283
[39]   HIGH REPRESENTATION OF WOMEN IN PARLIAMENT AND PROPORTIONAL ELECTORAL SYSTEM: DOES THIS RELATIONSHIP WORK IN RUSSIA? [J].
Mukhametov, Ruslan S. .
SRAVNITELNAYA POLITIKA-COMPARATIVE POLITICS, 2021, 12 (02) :82-93
[40]   THE SPANISH ELECTORAL SYSTEM FROM ITS ORIGINS TO THE CONSTITUTION OF 1978 [J].
Presno Linera, Miguel Angel .
HISTORIA CONSTITUCIONAL, 2018, (19) :89-121