Does the Electoral System Foster a Predominant Party System? Evidence from Turkey

被引:19
作者
Arslantas, Duzgun [1 ]
Arslantas, Senol [3 ]
Kaiser, Andre [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cologne, Cologne Ctr Comparat Polit, Cologne, Germany
[2] Univ Cologne, Cologne Ctr Comparat Polit, Comparat Polit, Cologne, Germany
[3] Istanbul Univ, Dept Polit Sci & Int Relat, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
AKP; dominant party; electoral system; electoral threshold; predominant party system; POLITICAL CONSEQUENCES; SPATIAL-ANALYSIS; AKP; NEOLIBERALISM; DISPROPORTIONALITY; DETERMINANTS; CLIENTELISM; TRANSITION; ELECTIONS; CLEAVAGES;
D O I
10.1111/spsr.12386
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
This paper discusses the role of the electoral system in making the Justice and Development Party (AKP) dominant. Drawing on Sartori's framework, we first clarify the concept of a predominant party system. Second, we examine the impact of the electoral system on the emergence of a predominant party system in Turkey. Analysing election results, we argue that the electoral system fosters dominance in three ways. First, a combination of electoral formula, national threshold and district threshold leads to over-representation of large parties and under-representation of small ones. Second, the fear of a wasted vote due to the high threshold prompts voters to support their second-best option, which concentrates the votes among large parties. Finally, the electoral system increases electoral turnout rates by extending polarization.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 143
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Electoral System, Party Politics and Legislative Candidate Selection in Taiwan [J].
Yu, Eric Chen-hua ;
Yu, Ching-hsin .
DEMOCRACY AND DEVELOPMENT: TAIWAN AND THE BALTIC COUNTRIES IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE, 2012, :162-175
[22]   Party-System Extremism in Majoritarian and Proportional Electoral Systems [J].
Dow, Jay K. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 41 :341-361
[23]   Emergence of a Dominant Party System After Multipartyism: Theoretical Implications from the Case of the AKP in Turkey [J].
Musil, Pelin Ayan .
SOUTH EUROPEAN SOCIETY AND POLITICS, 2015, 20 (01) :71-92
[24]   The party system effects of unstable electoral rules in Latin America [J].
Bunker, Kenneth ;
Negretto, Gabriel L. .
PARTY POLITICS, 2024, 30 (06) :1126-1142
[25]   Does Electoral Reform Change MPs' Behavior? Evidence from Romania [J].
Chiru, Mihail .
POLITICAL STUDIES REVIEW, 2021, 19 (03) :355-375
[26]   Does electoral competition affect public goods provision in dominant-party regimes? Evidence from Tanzania [J].
Rosenzweig, Steven C. .
ELECTORAL STUDIES, 2015, 39 :72-84
[27]   What determines preferences for an electoral system? Evidence from a binding referendum [J].
Riambau, Guillem ;
Stillman, Steven ;
Boe-Gibson, Geua .
PUBLIC CHOICE, 2021, 186 (1-2) :179-208
[28]   What determines preferences for an electoral system? Evidence from a binding referendum [J].
Guillem Riambau ;
Steven Stillman ;
Geua Boe-Gibson .
Public Choice, 2021, 186 :179-208
[29]   Who are the targets of familial electoral coercion? Evidence from Turkey [J].
Toros, Emre ;
Birch, Sarah .
DEMOCRATIZATION, 2019, 26 (08) :1342-1361
[30]   Exploring the level of party system institutionalization and party system type in Turkey: a convergence with established or new democracies? [J].
Oeney, Berna ;
Selck, Torsten J. .
TURKISH STUDIES, 2017, 18 (02) :209-228