Does the Electoral System Foster a Predominant Party System? Evidence from Turkey

被引:19
作者
Arslantas, Duzgun [1 ]
Arslantas, Senol [3 ]
Kaiser, Andre [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cologne, Cologne Ctr Comparat Polit, Cologne, Germany
[2] Univ Cologne, Cologne Ctr Comparat Polit, Comparat Polit, Cologne, Germany
[3] Istanbul Univ, Dept Polit Sci & Int Relat, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
AKP; dominant party; electoral system; electoral threshold; predominant party system; POLITICAL CONSEQUENCES; SPATIAL-ANALYSIS; AKP; NEOLIBERALISM; DISPROPORTIONALITY; DETERMINANTS; CLIENTELISM; TRANSITION; ELECTIONS; CLEAVAGES;
D O I
10.1111/spsr.12386
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
This paper discusses the role of the electoral system in making the Justice and Development Party (AKP) dominant. Drawing on Sartori's framework, we first clarify the concept of a predominant party system. Second, we examine the impact of the electoral system on the emergence of a predominant party system in Turkey. Analysing election results, we argue that the electoral system fosters dominance in three ways. First, a combination of electoral formula, national threshold and district threshold leads to over-representation of large parties and under-representation of small ones. Second, the fear of a wasted vote due to the high threshold prompts voters to support their second-best option, which concentrates the votes among large parties. Finally, the electoral system increases electoral turnout rates by extending polarization.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 143
页数:19
相关论文
共 96 条
[51]   EXPERT INTERPRETATIONS OF PARTY SPACE AND PARTY LOCATIONS IN 42 SOCIETIES [J].
HUBER, J ;
INGLEHART, R .
PARTY POLITICS, 1995, 1 (01) :73-111
[52]   The transformation of Turkish foreign policy: The rise of the trading state [J].
Kirisci, Kemal .
NEW PERSPECTIVES ON TURKEY, 2009, (40) :29-56
[53]  
Konda, 2015, 7 HAZ SANDK VE SECM
[54]  
Kutlu Yusuf, 2018, SECMEN KUMELERI HDP
[55]  
Lancaster C., 2016, Politics, Religion and Ideology, V17, P370, DOI DOI 10.1080/21567689.2016.1263197
[56]  
Levitsky StevenandLucan A Way., 2010, Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War
[57]   THE POLITICAL CONSEQUENCES OF ELECTORAL LAWS, 1945-85 [J].
LIJPHART, A .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1990, 84 (02) :481-496
[58]  
Lijphart Arend., 1994, ELECTORAL SYSTEMS PA
[59]  
LIPSET SM, 1960, ARCH EUR SOCIOL, V1, P50
[60]  
Magaloni B., 2006, Voting for autocracy: Hegemonic party survival and its demise in Mexico