Does the Electoral System Foster a Predominant Party System? Evidence from Turkey

被引:19
作者
Arslantas, Duzgun [1 ]
Arslantas, Senol [3 ]
Kaiser, Andre [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cologne, Cologne Ctr Comparat Polit, Cologne, Germany
[2] Univ Cologne, Cologne Ctr Comparat Polit, Comparat Polit, Cologne, Germany
[3] Istanbul Univ, Dept Polit Sci & Int Relat, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
AKP; dominant party; electoral system; electoral threshold; predominant party system; POLITICAL CONSEQUENCES; SPATIAL-ANALYSIS; AKP; NEOLIBERALISM; DISPROPORTIONALITY; DETERMINANTS; CLIENTELISM; TRANSITION; ELECTIONS; CLEAVAGES;
D O I
10.1111/spsr.12386
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
This paper discusses the role of the electoral system in making the Justice and Development Party (AKP) dominant. Drawing on Sartori's framework, we first clarify the concept of a predominant party system. Second, we examine the impact of the electoral system on the emergence of a predominant party system in Turkey. Analysing election results, we argue that the electoral system fosters dominance in three ways. First, a combination of electoral formula, national threshold and district threshold leads to over-representation of large parties and under-representation of small ones. Second, the fear of a wasted vote due to the high threshold prompts voters to support their second-best option, which concentrates the votes among large parties. Finally, the electoral system increases electoral turnout rates by extending polarization.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 143
页数:19
相关论文
共 96 条
[1]  
Acemolu D., 2015, NATL BUREAU EC RES W, V21606
[2]   Determinants of disproportionality and wasted votes [J].
Anckar, C .
ELECTORAL STUDIES, 1997, 16 (04) :501-515
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, ETHNICITY ELECTIONS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1967, The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, AGENTS BOSSES PATRON
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2010, DOMINANT POLITICAL P
[7]   DOMINANT PARTY SYSTEM - NEGLECTED MODEL OF DEMOCRATIC STABILITY [J].
ARIAN, A ;
BARNES, SH .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 1974, 36 (03) :592-614
[8]   Distributive Politics in a Multiparty System: The Conditional Cash Transfer Program in Turkey [J].
Aytac, S. Erdem .
COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 2014, 47 (09) :1211-1237
[9]   Turkey's 2015 parliamentary elections [J].
Baskan Canyas, Filiz ;
Canyas, F. Orkunt ;
Gumrukcu, Selin Bengi .
JOURNAL OF BALKAN AND NEAR EASTERN STUDIES, 2016, 18 (01) :77-89
[10]   Empirical investigation of party preferences and economic voting in Turkey [J].
Baslevent, C ;
Kirmanoglu, H ;
Senatalar, B .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL RESEARCH, 2005, 44 (04) :547-562