Drawing the Diversity Line: Numerical Thresholds of Diversity Vary by Group Status

被引:33
作者
Danbold, Felix [1 ]
Unzueta, Miguel M. [2 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Dept Management & Org, Stern Sch Business, 701A Tisch Hall,44 West 4th St, New York, NY 10003 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Anderson Sch Management, Dept Management & Org, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
关键词
diversity; intergroup relations; social dominance theory; AFFIRMATIVE-ACTION; GROUP THREAT; IN-GROUP; ATTITUDES; BELIEFS; RACE; DISCRIMINATION; PERCEPTIONS; GENDER; SHAPE;
D O I
10.1037/pspi0000182
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This research estimates the points of relative group representation at which members of dominant and nondominant groups declare an organization to be diverse. Across 7 studies. members of dominant groups, relative to members of nondominant groups, reported that diversity was achieved at lower representations of the nondominant group within an organization. This was explained by the dominant group members' relative opposition to using the equal representation of groups as a standard against which to judge diversity. This mediation was also replicated with the antiegalitarian dimension of social dominance orientation, suggesting that the setting of diversity thresholds serves a hierarchy relevant function. Group differences in thresholds of diversity were strongest when people were evaluating whether an organization was sufficiently (vs. descriptively) diverse, when group status was perceived to be threatened, and when the nondominant group was also a numerical minority in the relevant context.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 306
页数:24
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   AFFIRMATIVE-ACTION - FAIR SHAKERS AND SOCIAL ENGINEERS [J].
ABRAM, MB .
HARVARD LAW REVIEW, 1986, 99 (06) :1312-1326
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2021, NEW YORK TIMES
[3]   The Rules of Implicit Evaluation by Race, Religion, and Age [J].
Axt, Jordan R. ;
Ebersole, Charles R. ;
Nosek, Brian A. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 25 (09) :1804-1815
[4]   Fifty Years After the Civil Rights Act: Diversity-Management Practices in the Field [J].
Bartels, Lynn K. ;
Nadler, Joel T. ;
Kufahl, Katie ;
Pyatt, Jodie .
INDUSTRIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-PERSPECTIVES ON SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2013, 6 (04) :450-+
[5]   Diverse According to Whom? Racial Group Membership and Concerns about Discrimination Shape Diversity Judgments [J].
Bauman, Christopher W. ;
Trawalter, Sophie ;
Unzueta, Miguel M. .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2014, 40 (10) :1354-1372
[6]   Diversity in everyday discourse: The cultural ambiguities and consequences of "Happy Talk" [J].
Bell, Joyce M. ;
Hartmann, Douglas .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2007, 72 (06) :895-914
[7]   Perceiving Ethnic Diversity on Campus: Group Differences in Attention to Hierarchical Representation [J].
Binning, Kevin R. ;
Unzueta, Miguel M. .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE, 2013, 4 (04) :500-507
[8]  
Blalock HubertM., 1967, TOWARD A THEORY OF M
[9]   Race, interests, and beliefs about affirmative action - Unanswered questions and new directions [J].
Bobo, L .
AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST, 1998, 41 (07) :985-1003
[10]   DIVERSITY THRESHOLDS: HOW SOCIAL NORMS, VISIBILITY, AND SCRUTINY RELATE TO GROUP COMPOSITION [J].
Chang, Edward H. ;
Milkman, Katherine L. ;
Chugh, Dolly ;
Akinola, Modupe .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2019, 62 (01) :144-171