Effects of using a second-screen application on attention, learning, and user experience in an educational content

被引:6
作者
Lee, Seungyup [1 ,2 ]
Baek, Jongsoo [2 ]
Han, Gunhee [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Sch Integrated Technol, Incheon, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Yonsei Inst Convergence Technol, Incheon, South Korea
关键词
Second-screen application; media multitasking; educational content; content relevance; multimedia learning; LIMITED CAPACITY MODEL; MEDIA MULTITASKING; SELF-EFFICACY; ACADEMIC-ACHIEVEMENT; VISUAL-ATTENTION; AROUSING CONTENT; COGNITIVE LOAD; TELEVISION; INFORMATION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1080/10494820.2017.1324494
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Using a secondary device while viewing a primary device (i.e. TV), or media multitasking, is now common. Numerous researchers and practitioners have attempted to introduce secondary devices into education as a new learning environment providing additional information to the user. However, the learning-related effects of using a second screen remain controversial. This study examined the effects of second-screen-application use on attention, learning performance, and user experience per content relevance for three primary contents (PC; i.e. videos) requiring different amounts of cognitive load: low, medium, and high. Second-screen use reduced learning performance and user satisfaction when the PC required high cognitive load. However, participants exhibited increased learning performance, concentration, and satisfaction with the PC requiring medium-cognitive-load when highly relevant information was presented on the secondary screen simultaneously. Based on these findings, guidelines were suggested for designing a second-screen application without degrading users' learning and experience.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 307
页数:19
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]  
Ainasoja M., 2014, UBICOMM 2014: The Eighth International Conference on Mobile Ubiquitous Computing, Systems, Services and Technologies, P196
[2]  
Albaili M.A., 1997, EDUC PSYCHOL-UK, V17, P171, DOI [10.1080/0144341970170112, DOI 10.1080/0144341970170112]
[3]  
Anderson D., 1983, Children's understanding of television, P1
[4]   TELEVISION VIEWING AT HOME - AGE TRENDS IN VISUAL-ATTENTION AND TIME WITH TV [J].
ANDERSON, DR ;
LORCH, EP ;
FIELD, DE ;
COLLINS, PA ;
NATHAN, JG .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1986, 57 (04) :1024-1033
[5]  
[Anonymous], STUDY YOUNG CONSUMER
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2012, CHI 12 EA HUM FACT C, DOI DOI 10.1145/2212776.2212832
[7]  
Anstead Edward., 2014, P ACM INT C INTERACT, P103, DOI [10.1145/2602299, DOI 10.1145/2602299]
[8]   Background television and reading memory in context -: Assessing TV interference and facilitative context effects on encoding versus retrieval processes [J].
Armstrong, GB ;
Chung, L .
COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2000, 27 (03) :327-352
[9]   SHORT-TERM MEMORY AND LIMITED CAPACITY HYPOTHESIS [J].
BADDELEY, AD ;
SCOTT, D ;
DRYNAN, R ;
SMITH, JC .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1969, 60 :51-&
[10]  
Basapur S., 2011, EUROITV 11 P 9 EUROP, DOI [10.1145/2000119.2000145, DOI 10.1145/2000119.2000145]