A parametric method for estimation of leaf area index using landsat ETM plus data

被引:19
|
作者
Amani, Meisam [1 ]
Mobasheri, Mohammad Reza [1 ]
机构
[1] KN Toosi Univ Technol, Fac Geodesy & Geomat Engn, Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing Dept, Tehran 1969715433, Iran
关键词
remote sensing; vegetation; LAI; landsat; ETM; REGRESSION; MODEL; LAI; PREDICTION; GRASSLAND; ACCURACY; CARBON; WATER;
D O I
10.1080/15481603.2015.1055540
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Leaf Area Index (LAI) is a key variable for monitoring biophysical and biochemical characteristic of vegetation. So far, various remote-sensing methods are proposed to assess this index; each has its own advantages and limitations. In this study, the Scatterplot of NIR and Red bands (SNIR-R) of ETM+ images was used for LAI estimation. For this, nine different parameters consisting of five distances and four angles were extracted from SNIR-R. All possible combinations of these nine parameters were taken into account and as a result, 511 different regression equations were developed for estimation of LAI. The best regression equation (5P-LAI3) was made of two angles and three distances had the highest correlation coefficient (R) of 0.94 and root mean square (RMSE) of 0.75. On another approach, the triangle of scattered data in the SNIR-R was divided into three separate regions based on PVI (Perpendicular Vegetation Index) values. Three different regression equations were fitted to each region. Use of this Triangle Segmentation Model (TSM) improved the results slightly; that is, comparing with the results of general model 5P-LAI3, RMSE reduced to 0.66 and R increased to 0.96. The data collected throughout BigFoot project was used in this study. Comparing with other models in which BigFoot data were used, it was concluded that despite the simplicity of 5P-LAI3 model, it has an acceptable accuracy and TSM showed the highest accuracy, after all.
引用
收藏
页码:478 / 497
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Modelling forest stand volume and tree density using Landsat ETM plus data
    Mohammadi, J.
    Joibary, Shaban Shataee
    Yaghmaee, F.
    Mahiny, A. S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2010, 31 (11) : 2959 - 2975
  • [32] Topoclimate Mapping Using Landsat ETM plus Thermal Data: Wolin Island, Poland
    Ciazela, Marta
    Ciazela, Jakub
    REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (14)
  • [33] Mapping forest parameters using decision trees and multitemporal landsat ETM plus data
    Vikhamar, D
    Fjone, G
    IGARSS 2004: IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-7: SCIENCE FOR SOCIETY: EXPLORING AND MANAGING A CHANGING PLANET, 2004, : 2365 - 2368
  • [34] Simulating Landsat ETM plus imagery using DAIS 7915 hyperspectral scanner data
    Kavzoglu, T
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2004, 25 (22) : 5049 - 5067
  • [35] Postflood damage evaluation using landsat TM and ETM plus data integrated with DEM
    Gianinetto, M
    Villa, P
    Lechi, G
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2006, 44 (01): : 236 - 243
  • [36] Classification of Landsat ETM plus Data Using a Bayesian Multi-net Classifier
    Yun, Ouyang
    Jianwen, Ma
    Liwei, Li
    2006 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, VOLS 1-8, 2006, : 2734 - 2737
  • [37] Landsat 8 Based Leaf Area Index Estimation in Loblolly Pine Plantations
    Blinn, Christine E.
    House, Matthew N.
    Wynne, Randolph H.
    Thomas, Valerie A.
    Fox, Thomas R.
    Sumnall, Matthew
    FORESTS, 2019, 10 (03)
  • [38] Comparative analysis of EO-1 ALI and Hyperion, and Landsat ETM+ data for mapping forest crown closure and leaf area index
    Pu, Ruiliang
    Gong, Peng
    Yu, Qian
    SENSORS, 2008, 8 (06) : 3744 - 3766
  • [39] Monitoring heat losses using Landsat ETM plus thermal infrared data - a case study at Kuju fumarolic area in Japan
    Mia, Md. Bodruddoza
    Fujimitsu, Yasuhiro
    ACTA GEOPHYSICA, 2013, 61 (05) : 1262 - 1278
  • [40] EO-1 Hyperion, ALI and Landsat 7 ETM+ data comparison for estimating forest crown closure and leaf area index
    Pu, R
    Yu, Q
    Gong, P
    Biging, GS
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2005, 26 (03) : 457 - 474