A parametric method for estimation of leaf area index using landsat ETM plus data

被引:19
作者
Amani, Meisam [1 ]
Mobasheri, Mohammad Reza [1 ]
机构
[1] KN Toosi Univ Technol, Fac Geodesy & Geomat Engn, Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing Dept, Tehran 1969715433, Iran
关键词
remote sensing; vegetation; LAI; landsat; ETM; REGRESSION; MODEL; LAI; PREDICTION; GRASSLAND; ACCURACY; CARBON; WATER;
D O I
10.1080/15481603.2015.1055540
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Leaf Area Index (LAI) is a key variable for monitoring biophysical and biochemical characteristic of vegetation. So far, various remote-sensing methods are proposed to assess this index; each has its own advantages and limitations. In this study, the Scatterplot of NIR and Red bands (SNIR-R) of ETM+ images was used for LAI estimation. For this, nine different parameters consisting of five distances and four angles were extracted from SNIR-R. All possible combinations of these nine parameters were taken into account and as a result, 511 different regression equations were developed for estimation of LAI. The best regression equation (5P-LAI3) was made of two angles and three distances had the highest correlation coefficient (R) of 0.94 and root mean square (RMSE) of 0.75. On another approach, the triangle of scattered data in the SNIR-R was divided into three separate regions based on PVI (Perpendicular Vegetation Index) values. Three different regression equations were fitted to each region. Use of this Triangle Segmentation Model (TSM) improved the results slightly; that is, comparing with the results of general model 5P-LAI3, RMSE reduced to 0.66 and R increased to 0.96. The data collected throughout BigFoot project was used in this study. Comparing with other models in which BigFoot data were used, it was concluded that despite the simplicity of 5P-LAI3 model, it has an acceptable accuracy and TSM showed the highest accuracy, after all.
引用
收藏
页码:478 / 497
页数:20
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Angstrom A., 1925, Geogr. Ann., V7, P323, DOI [10.1080/20014422.1925.11881121, DOI 10.1080/20014422.1925.11881121]
  • [2] Baret F., 1993, Remote Sens. Rev, V7, P65, DOI DOI 10.1080/02757259309532166
  • [3] Comparison of regression and geostatistical methods for mapping Leaf Area Index (LAI) with Landsat ETM+ data over a boreal forest
    Berterretche, M
    Hudak, AT
    Cohen, WB
    Maiersperger, TK
    Gower, ST
    Dungan, J
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 96 (01) : 49 - 61
  • [4] DO BIOPHYSICS AND PHYSIOLOGY MATTER IN ECOSYSTEM MODELS
    BONAN, GB
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 1993, 24 (04) : 281 - 285
  • [5] BOWERS S. A., 1965, SOIL SCI, V100, P130, DOI 10.1097/00010694-196508000-00009
  • [6] Grassland modeling and monitoring with SPOT-4 VEGETATION instrument during the 1997-1999 SALSA experiment
    Cayrol, P
    Chehbouni, A
    Kergoat, L
    Dedieu, G
    Mordelet, P
    Nouvellon, Y
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2000, 105 (1-3) : 91 - 115
  • [7] Cohen W. B., 2003, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.RSE.2003.06.006
  • [8] MODIS land cover and LAI collection 4 product quality across nine sites in the western hemisphere
    Cohen, Warren B.
    Maiersperger, Thomas K.
    Turner, David P.
    Ritts, William D.
    Pflugmacher, Dirk
    Kennedy, Robert E.
    Kirschbaum, Alan
    Running, Steven W.
    Costa, Marcos
    Gower, Stith T.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2006, 44 (07): : 1843 - 1857
  • [9] Spectral/textural attributes from ALI/EO-1 for mapping primary and secondary tropical forests and studying the relationships with biophysical parameters
    da Silva, Ricardo D.
    Galvao, Lenio S.
    dos Santos, Joao R.
    Silva, Camila V. de J.
    de Moura, Yhasmin M.
    [J]. GISCIENCE & REMOTE SENSING, 2014, 51 (06) : 677 - 694
  • [10] Investigating the relationship between NDVI and LAI in semi-arid grassland in Inner Mongolia using in-situ measurements
    Fan, L.
    Gao, Y.
    Brueck, H.
    Bernhofer, Ch.
    [J]. THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2009, 95 (1-2) : 151 - 156