3D seismic denoising based on a low-redundancy curvelet transform

被引:27
作者
Cao, Jingjie [1 ]
Zhao, Jingtao [2 ]
Hu, Zhiying [3 ]
机构
[1] Shijiazhuang Univ Econ, Shijiazhuang 050031, Hebei, Peoples R China
[2] PetroChina, Res Inst Petr Explorat & Dev, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[3] Xian Fanyi Univ, Xian 710105, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
curvelet transform; denoising; low redundancy; sparse optimization; one-norm; TAU-P TRANSFORM; THRESHOLDING ALGORITHM; NOISE ATTENUATION; T-X; INTERPOLATION; REDUCTION; INVERSION;
D O I
10.1088/1742-2132/12/4/566
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Contamination of seismic signal with noise is one of the main challenges during seismic data processing. Several methods exist for eliminating different types of noises, but optimal random noise attenuation remains difficult. Based on multi-scale, multi-directional locality of curvelet transform, the curvelet thresholding method is a relatively new method for random noise elimination. However, the high redundancy of a 3D curvelet transform makes its computational time and memory for massive data processing costly. To improve the efficiency of the curvelet thresholding denoising, a low-redundancy curvelet transform was introduced. The redundancy of the low-redundancy curvelet transform is approximately one-quarter of the original transform and the tightness of the original transform is also kept, thus the low-redundancy curvelet transform calls for less memory and computational resource compared with the original one. Numerical results on 3D synthetic and field data demonstrate that the low-redundancy curvelet denoising consumes one-quarter of the CPU time compared with the original curvelet transform using iterative thresholding denoising when comparable results are obtained. Thus, the low-redundancy curvelet transform is a good candidate for massive seismic denoising.
引用
收藏
页码:566 / 576
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   LATERAL PREDICTION FOR NOISE ATTENUATION BY T-X AND F-X TECHNIQUES [J].
ABMA, R ;
CLAERBOUT, J .
GEOPHYSICS, 1995, 60 (06) :1887-1896
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, WAVELET TOUR SIGNAL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 8 MIDDL E GEOSC C GE
[4]   Iterative Thresholding for Sparse Approximations [J].
Blumensath, Thomas ;
Davies, Mike E. .
JOURNAL OF FOURIER ANALYSIS AND APPLICATIONS, 2008, 14 (5-6) :629-654
[5]  
Broadhead Michael K., 2008, Leading Edge, V27, P226, DOI 10.1190/1.2840371
[6]  
Candes E. J., 2000, Tech. Rep.
[7]   New tight frames of curvelets and optimal representations of objects with piecewise C2 singularities [J].
Candès, EJ ;
Donoho, DL .
COMMUNICATIONS ON PURE AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2004, 57 (02) :219-266
[8]   Fast discrete curvelet transforms [J].
Candes, Emmanuel ;
Demanet, Laurent ;
Donoho, David ;
Ying, Lexing .
MULTISCALE MODELING & SIMULATION, 2006, 5 (03) :861-899
[9]   A review on restoration of seismic wavefields based on regularization and compressive sensing [J].
Cao, Jingjie ;
Wang, Yanfei ;
Zhao, Jingtao ;
Yang, Changchun .
INVERSE PROBLEMS IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2011, 19 (05) :679-704
[10]  
Cao S., 2005, APPL GEOPHYS, V2, P70, DOI [10.1007/s11770-005-0034-4, DOI 10.1007/S11770-005-0034-4]