A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead

被引:697
作者
Seppelt, Ralf [1 ]
Dormann, Carsten F. [1 ]
Eppink, Florian V. [1 ]
Lautenbach, Sven [1 ]
Schmidt, Stefan [1 ]
机构
[1] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Computat Landscape Ecol, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
conservation policy; ecosystem functioning; ecosystem management; ecosystem service assessment; environmental values; natural capital; natural resource management; DECISION-MAKING; LAND-USE; CONSERVATION; MANAGEMENT; SCIENCE; SUSTAINABILITY; BIODIVERSITY; TRADEOFFS; VALUATION; LANDSCAPE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01952.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
P>1. Ecosystem services are defined as the benefits that humans obtain from ecosystems. Employing the ecosystem service concept is intended to support the development of policies and instruments that integrate social, economic and ecological perspectives. In recent years, this concept has become the paradigm of ecosystem management. 2. The prolific use of the term 'ecosystem services' in scientific studies has given rise to concerns about its arbitrary application. A quantitative review of recent literature shows the diversity of approaches and uncovers a lack of consistent methodology. 3. From this analysis, we have derived four facets that characterise the holistic ideal of ecosystem services research: (i) biophysical realism of ecosystem data and models; (ii) consideration of local trade-offs; (iii) recognition of off-site effects; and (iv) comprehensive but critical involvement of stakeholders within assessment studies. 4. These four facets should be taken as a methodological blueprint for further development and discussion. They should critically reveal and elucidate what may often appear to be ad-hoc approaches to ecosystem service assessments. 5. Synthesis and applications: Based on this quantitative review, we provide guidelines for further development and discussions supporting consistency in applications of the ecosystem service concept as well as the credibility of results, which in turn can make it easier to generalise from the numerous individual studies.
引用
收藏
页码:630 / 636
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] A critical review of multi-criteria decision making methods with special reference to forest management and planning
    Ananda, Jayanath
    Herath, Gamini
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (10) : 2535 - 2548
  • [2] Ecosystem-service science and the way forward for conservation
    Armsworth, P. R.
    Chan, K. M. A.
    Daily, G. C.
    Ehrlich, P. R.
    Kremen, C.
    Ricketts, T. H.
    Sanjayan, M. A.
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2007, 21 (06) : 1383 - 1384
  • [3] Ash N., 2010, ECOSYSTEMS HUMAN WEL
  • [4] Assessment Millennium Ecosystem, 2005, ECOSYSTEMS HUMAN WEL
  • [5] Coastal ecosystem-based management with nonlinear ecological functions and values
    Barbier, Edward B.
    Koch, Evamaria W.
    Silliman, Brian R.
    Hacker, Sally D.
    Wolanski, Eric
    Primavera, Jurgenne
    Granek, Elise F.
    Polasky, Stephen
    Aswani, Shankar
    Cramer, Lori A.
    Stoms, David M.
    Kennedy, Chris J.
    Bael, David
    Kappel, Carrie V.
    Perillo, Gerardo M. E.
    Reed, Denise J.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2008, 319 (5861) : 321 - 323
  • [6] Modeling the dynamics of the integrated earth system and the value of global ecosystem services using the GUMBO model
    Boumans, R
    Costanza, R
    Farley, J
    Wilson, MA
    Portela, R
    Rotmans, J
    Villa, F
    Grasso, M
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 41 (03) : 529 - 560
  • [7] What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units
    Boyd, James
    Banzhaf, Spencer
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 63 (2-3) : 616 - 626
  • [8] Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
    Carpenter, Stephen R.
    Mooney, Harold A.
    Agard, John
    Capistrano, Doris
    DeFries, Ruth S.
    Diaz, Sandra
    Dietz, Thomas
    Duraiappah, Anantha K.
    Oteng-Yeboah, Alfred
    Pereira, Henrique Miguel
    Perrings, Charles
    Reid, Walter V.
    Sarukhan, Jose
    Scholes, Robert J.
    Whyte, Anne
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2009, 106 (05) : 1305 - 1312
  • [9] Conservation planning for ecosystem services
    Chan, Kai M. A.
    Shaw, M. Rebecca
    Cameron, David R.
    Underwood, Emma C.
    Daily, Gretchen C.
    [J]. PLOS BIOLOGY, 2006, 4 (11) : 2138 - 2152
  • [10] Ecological forecasts: An emerging imperative
    Clark, JS
    Carpenter, SR
    Barber, M
    Collins, S
    Dobson, A
    Foley, JA
    Lodge, DM
    Pascual, M
    Pielke, R
    Pizer, W
    Pringle, C
    Reid, WV
    Rose, KA
    Sala, O
    Schlesinger, WH
    Wall, DH
    Wear, D
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2001, 293 (5530) : 657 - 660