Analysis of regional differences and dynamic mechanisms of agricultural carbon emission efficiency in China's seven agricultural regions

被引:31
作者
Zhang, Xiaodan [1 ]
Liao, Kaicheng [1 ]
Zhou, Xianghong [1 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Bldg A,1 Zhangwu Rd, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
关键词
Dynamic efficiency; Technological change; Technological efficiency change; Dagum Gini coefficient; PVAR model; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; DRIVING FACTOR; PRODUCTIVITY; TECHNOLOGY; INDEX;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-021-16661-w
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A profound understanding of the present status and regional characteristics of China's agricultural carbon emissions (ACE) is the basic prerequisite for exploring a pathway to ACE reduction that is compatible with China's national conditions. This study uses the inter-provincial agricultural industry panel data from 2001 to 2017 and selects the three-stage slack-based measure data envelope analysis (SBM-DEA) model and Malmquist-Luenberger(ML) index model to measure the dynamic efficiency of agricultural carbon emissions (ACE). Additionally, this study uses the Dagum Gini coefficient and the panel vector auto-regression(PVAR) model to analyze the sources of regional differences in dynamic efficiency and the internal structure, respectively. The empirical results reveal the following: (i) The dynamic efficiency of China's ACE is in a state of "efficiency optimization." Although both technological change and technological efficiency change are in an "efficient" state, they also show a decline in technological efficiency change and a regression in technological change, respectively. (ii) The overall Dagum Gini coefficient of China's ACE dynamic efficiency, technological change, and technological efficiency change all demonstrate upward trends. The gap between regions is the main reason for the long-term gap between the dynamic efficiency of China's ACE, technological change, and technological efficiency change. (iii) Regardless of the time horizon, technological change has always been the main driving force for the continuous growth of dynamic efficiency; the contribution of technological change to dynamic efficiency is far greater than that of technological efficiency change. This conclusion has been verified in samples from different regions of China.
引用
收藏
页码:38258 / 38284
页数:27
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Beinhocker E., 2008, The Carbon Productivity Challenge: Curbing Climate Change and Sustaining Economic Growth
[2]  
McKinsey Climate Change Special Initiative
[3]  
[程琳琳 Cheng Linlin], 2018, [中国农业大学学报, Journal of China Agricultural University], V23, P218
[4]  
[陈晓红 Cheng Xiaohong], 2017, [运筹与管理, Operations Research and Management Science], V26, P115
[5]   Efficiency and abatement costs of energy-related CO2 emissions in China: A slacks-based efficiency measure [J].
Choi, Yongrok ;
Zhang, Ning ;
Zhou, P. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2012, 98 :198-208
[6]   Productivity and undesirable outputs: A directional distance function approach [J].
Chung, YH ;
Fare, R ;
Grosskopf, S .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1997, 51 (03) :229-240
[7]  
Dagum Camilo., 1997, Empirical Economics, V22, P515, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF01205777, 10.1007/BF01205777]
[8]   Exploring the relationship between agricultural electricity consumption and output: New evidence from Turkish regional data [J].
Dogan, Eyup ;
Sebri, Maamar ;
Turkekul, Berna .
ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 95 :370-377
[9]   Applying a Ruggiero three-stage super-efficiency DEA model to gauge regional carbon emission efficiency: evidence from China [J].
Dong, Feng ;
Long, Ruyin ;
Bian, Zhengfu ;
Xu, Xihui ;
Yu, Bolin ;
Wang, Ying .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2017, 87 (03) :1453-1468
[10]  
Dong HongMin Dong HongMin, 2008, Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, V24, P269