Policy Analysis of Suppression and Mitigation Strategies in the Management of an Outbreak Through the Example of COVID-19 Pandemic

被引:14
作者
Kayi, Ilker [1 ]
Sakarya, Sibel [1 ]
机构
[1] Koc Univ, Sch Med, Dept Publ Hlth, Istanbul, Turkey
来源
INFECTIOUS DISEASES AND CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY | 2020年 / 2卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.36519/idcm.2020.0009
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objective: The objective of this study is to review the containment approaches adopted by countries to control COVID-19 pandemic. In our analysis, we have used Bacchi's framework for interpretive policy analysis and examined the measures countries have taken and discussed the premise underlying containment strategies. We have included in our analysis United States of America, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Germany, Italy, Turkey, South Korea, Singapore, Japan and China.There are essentially two strategies that are used in the management of an outbreak: suppression or mitigation. Suppression strategy aims to lower the basic reproduction number (Ro) below 1 and thereby reduce the number of infected people or eliminate the person-to-person transmission. Mitigation approach, on the other hand, aims to generate community (herd) immunity by allowing the controlled infection of people. In this approach, the aim is not to bring Ro under 1 but to mitigate the health effects of the outbreak. It is seen that given the epidemiological features of the disease, the scope of the virus, and the limitation of the intervention resources at hand, the suppression approach is accepted more widely by the countries in terms of Covid-19 pandemic. In contrast, the mitigation strategy is approached with suspicion. The approach aiming to achieve herd immunity seems more suitable for situations in which it is possible to protect the high-risk groups by administrating vaccine.These evaluations should be carried out following the circumstances of the country in question. It is essential to form an evidence-based plan that is appropriate for the national context. It should be kept in mind that the solutions for the fight against the virus do not solely consist of those ready-made implementations by choosing one option over the other and that mixed models could be brought to the agenda when required.Conclusion: epidemics, immunity, herd, health policy, infection control
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 41
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Anderson C, 2020, New York TimesMar 28
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Dutch NewsMar 17
[3]  
Bacchi C., 2009, Analysing policy: what's the problem represented to be?
[4]  
Branas C.C ..., 2020, medRxiv
[5]   A guide to policy analysis as a research method [J].
Browne, Jennifer ;
Coffey, Brian ;
Cook, Kay ;
Meiklejohn, Sarah ;
Palermo, Claire .
HEALTH PROMOTION INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 34 (05) :1032-1044
[6]   Health literacy and infectious diseases: why does it matter? [J].
Castro-Sanchez, Enrique ;
Chang, Peter W. S. ;
Vila-Candel, Rafael ;
Escobedo, Angel A. ;
Holmes, Alison H. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2016, 43 :103-110
[7]   How simulation modelling can help reduce the impact of COVID-19 [J].
Currie, Christine S. M. ;
Fowler, John W. ;
Kotiadis, Kathy ;
Monks, Thomas ;
Onggo, Bhakti Stephan ;
Robertson, Duncan A. ;
Tako, Antuela A. .
JOURNAL OF SIMULATION, 2020, 14 (02) :83-97
[8]  
Cyranoski D, 2020, Nature News ExplainerMar 17
[9]   We Need Strong Public Health Care to Contain the Global Corona Pandemic [J].
De Ceukelaire, Wim ;
Bodini, Chiara .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES, 2020, 50 (03) :276-277
[10]   Transmission dynamics of the COVID-19 outbreak and effectiveness of government interventions: A data-driven analysis [J].
Fang, Yaqing ;
Nie, Yiting ;
Penny, Marshare .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2020, 92 (06) :645-659