Reduced likelihood of cancer screening among women in urban areas and with low socio-economic status: A multilevel analysis in Japan

被引:52
作者
Fukuda, Y [1 ]
Nakamura, K [1 ]
Takano, T [1 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Med & Dent Univ, Grad Sch, Div Publ Hlth, Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1138519, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
socio-economic factors; income; mass screening; urban health; cancer; residential characteristics;
D O I
10.1016/j.puhe.2005.03.013
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives: To elucidate socio-economic predictors of participation in cancer screening in Japanese women, paying attention to regional variations. Methods: In a nationally representative sample of women aged 40-64 years (n = 15,224) in Japan, the relationships of self-reported attendance at screening for stomach, colon, uterine and breast cancers with individual characteristics (marital status, occupation and household income) and regional variables (living in a metropolitan area or not, and per capita income) were examined using multilevel analysis. Results: The participation rate ranged from 21.6% for colon cancer to 32.5% for uterine cancer. Being married, employed and having a higher household income were significantly associated with a higher likelihood of cancer screening for all types of cancer: the adjusted odds ratio in the lowest income quintile ranged from 0.45 for uterine cancer to 0.53 for colon cancer compared with the highest income quintile. There was significant regional variance, and living in a metropolitan area and per capita income were associated with a reduced likelihood of cancer screening. Conclusions: Women with lower socio-economic status and living in urban areas are less likely to participate in cancer screening in Japan. Cancer screening should be encouraged in urban areas, taking account of the socio-economic inequalities. (c) 2005 The Royal Institute of Public Health. published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:875 / 884
页数:10
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
ACHESON D, 2000, INDEPENDENT INQUIRY
[2]   Measuring adherence to mammography screening recommendations among low-income women [J].
Amstrong, K ;
Long, JA ;
Shea, JA .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2004, 38 (06) :754-760
[3]  
ASAHI S, 2003, KOSEINO SHIHYO, V50, P1
[4]   Cervical screening and health inequality in England in the 1990s [J].
Baker, D ;
Middleton, E .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2003, 57 (06) :417-423
[5]   Comparison of various characteristics of women who do and do not attend for breast cancer screening [J].
Banks, E ;
Beral, V ;
Cameron, R ;
Hogg, A ;
Langley, N ;
Barnes, I ;
Bull, D ;
Reeves, G ;
English, R ;
Taylor, S ;
Elliman, J ;
Harris, CL .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2002, 4 (01) :R1
[6]   Validity of self-reported mammography: Examining recall and covariates among older women in a health maintenance organization [J].
Caplan, LS ;
Mandelson, MT ;
Anderson, LA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 157 (03) :267-272
[7]   Men's and women's knowledge and perceptions of breast cancer and mammography screening [J].
Chamot, E ;
Perneger, TV .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2002, 34 (03) :380-385
[8]   Bias [J].
Delgado-Rodríguez, M ;
Llorca, J .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2004, 58 (08) :635-641
[9]  
Fukuda Y, 2005, INT J EPIDEMIOL, V34, P100, DOI 10.1093/ije/dyh283
[10]   Wide range of socioeconomic factors associated with mortality among cities in Japan [J].
Fukuda, Y ;
Nakamura, K ;
Takano, T .
HEALTH PROMOTION INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 19 (02) :177-187