Risk analysis in research environment - Part I: Modeling Lab Criticity Index using Improved Risk Priority Number

被引:37
作者
Ouedraogo, Aristide [1 ]
Groso, Amela [2 ]
Meyer, Thierry [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne, Grp Chem & Phys Safety, Inst Chem Sci & Engn, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne, Sch Basic Sci, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Risk analysis; Risk ranking; Risk assessment; Risk Priority Number; Safety; FAILURE MODE; FUZZY-LOGIC;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssci.2011.02.006
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Current available risk analysis techniques are well adapted to industry needs since they were developed for its purpose. All hazards present in industry are also met in research/academia, although quantities of some hazardous substances are smaller. Still, because of its characteristics e.g., high turnover of collaborators, rapid reorientation of research programs, freedom of research, equipment often in development stage, difficulty to obtain accidents statistics, not well described processes, etc., research/academia milieu is an environment whose risks are difficult to assess by available risk analysis techniques. In the present paper, a new methodology, Laboratory Assessment and Risk Analysis - LARA, for research and/or complex environment is proposed. When multiple hazards are analyzed, the result of assessment is a risk ranking calculated using a Lab Criticity Index - LCI, providing identification of critical areas and prioritization of safety actions. LCI is conceived through two approaches: the Risk Priority Number - RPN and the Analytic Hierarchy Process - AHP. It is suggested to estimate risk as a combination of severity, probability, detectability, worsening factors and research specificities. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:778 / 784
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
*AICHE, 2002, LAYER PROT AN SIMPL
[2]   Risk assessment practices in The Netherlands [J].
Ale, BJM .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2002, 40 (1-4) :105-126
[3]  
AREZEZ PM, 2007, SAFETY SCI, V8
[4]  
BAYBUTT P, 2007, IMPROVED RISK GRAPH, P66
[5]  
BENDAYA M, 1993, INT J QUALITY RELIAB, V13, P43, DOI DOI 10.1108/02656719610108297
[6]   An assessment of RPN prioritization in a failure modes effects and criticality analysis [J].
Bowles, JB .
ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM, 2003 PROCEEDINGS, 2003, :380-386
[7]   FUZZY-LOGIC PRIORITIZATION OF FAILURES IN A SYSTEM FAILURE MODE, EFFECTS AND CRITICALITY ANALYSIS [J].
BOWLES, JB ;
PELAEZ, CE .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1995, 50 (02) :203-213
[8]  
BOWLES JB, 1994, REL MAINT S P ANN 24, P449
[9]  
BRABAND J, 2003, J SAFETY, V21, P23
[10]  
BRABAND J, 2006, SYSTEM SAFETY, P285