Vibration control strategies for proof-mass actuators

被引:38
作者
Huyanan, Satienpong [1 ]
Sims, Neil D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Dept Mech Engn, Adv Mfg Res Ctr Boeing, Sheffield S1 3JD, S Yorkshire, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
proof-mass actuator; active vibration control; machine tool chatter; virtual passive control;
D O I
10.1177/1077546307080031
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Proof-mass actuators have been considered for a broad range of structural vibration control problems, from seismic protection for tall buildings to the improvement of metal machining productivity by stabilizing the self-excited vibrations known as chatter. This broad range of potential applications means that a variety of controllers have been proposed, without drawing direct comparisons with other controller designs that have been considered for different applications. This article takes three controllers that are potentially suitable for the machining chatter problem: Direct velocity feedback, tuned-mass-damper control ( or vibration absorber control), and active-tuned-mass-damper control ( or active vibration absorber control). These control strategies are restated within the more general framework of Virtual Passive Control. Their performance is first compared using root locus techniques, with a model based on experimental data, including the low frequency dynamics of the proof-mass. The frequency response of the test structure is then illustrated under open and closed-loop conditions. The application of the control strategies to avoid machine-tool chatter vibrations is then discussed, without going into detail on the underlying physical mechanisms of chatter. It is concluded that virtual passive absorber control is more straightforward to implement than virtual skyhook damping, and may be better suited to the problem of machining chatter.
引用
收藏
页码:1785 / 1806
页数:22
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
CAO TTV, 2000, P 39 IEEE C DEC CONT
[2]  
Chung B., 1997, Journal of Vibration and Control, V3, P279, DOI 10.1177/107754639700300303
[3]   USE OF AUDIO SIGNALS FOR CHATTER DETECTION AND CONTROL [J].
DELIO, T ;
TLUSTY, J ;
SMITH, S .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR INDUSTRY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1992, 114 (02) :146-157
[4]  
Den Hartog J.P., 1985, MECH VIBRATIONS
[5]  
Ewins D.J., 2009, Modal testing: theory, practice and application
[6]   Active damping of chatter in machine tools - demonstration with a 'hardware-in-the-loop' simulator [J].
Ganguli, A ;
Deraemaeker, A ;
Horodinca, M ;
Preumont, A .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART I-JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND CONTROL ENGINEERING, 2005, 219 (I5) :359-369
[7]   Evaluation of sliding mode and proportional-integral-derivative controlled structures with an active mass damper [J].
Guclu, R ;
Sertbas, A .
JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND CONTROL, 2005, 11 (03) :397-406
[8]   EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF PASSIVE ENHANCEMENT OF DAMPING FOR SPACE STRUCTURES [J].
HAGOOD, NW ;
CRAWLEY, EF .
JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 1991, 14 (06) :1100-1109
[9]  
Juang J-N., 2001, Identification and Control of Mechanical Systems
[10]   ROBUST CONTROLLER DESIGNS FOR 2ND-ORDER DYNAMIC-SYSTEMS - A VIRTUAL PASSIVE APPROACH [J].
JUANG, JN ;
PHAN, M .
JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 1992, 15 (05) :1192-1198