High-fidelity simulation and virtual reality: an evaluation of medical students' experiences

被引:18
作者
Macnamara, Alexandra Frances [1 ]
Bird, Katie [1 ]
Rigby, Alan [1 ]
Sathyapalan, Thozhukat [1 ]
Hepburn, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Hull York Med Sch, Kingston Upon Hull, N Humberside, England
关键词
simulation-based medical education; simulation; medical education research; virtual reality; high fidelity simulation; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000625
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Simulation technology is widely used in medical education, providing an environment in which students can develop and practise a multitude of skills that are relevant to clinical practice, without the risk of harm to patients. Methods We conducted a mixed methods cross-over study with quantitative and qualitative outcomes. This analysed students' perceptions of two simulation technologies: a high-fidelity patient simulator and virtual reality. Twenty final year medical students completed a questionnaire after having experienced both simulation modalities. Results Students scored the patient simulator higher in domains such as developing team working and 'ABCDE assessment skills', whereas the virtual reality simulation was more immersive and fun. Participants found the patient simulator more useful in preparing them for clinical practice. Conclusion Medical students in this study expressed that a high-fidelity patient simulator, in a simulated clinical environment, was of greater value to their preparation for clinical practice than virtual reality simulation of a similar environment. However, the virtual reality simulation offered a near comparable experience, and was found to be was enjoyable, immersive and easily portable.
引用
收藏
页码:528 / 535
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Amer A, 2006, ELECTRON J RES EDUC, V4, P213
[2]  
Bearman M.L., 2013, Oxford Textbook of Medical Education, V1, P186
[3]  
Bowman DA, 2009, HIGHER LEVELS IMMERS
[4]  
Breining G, FUTURE FAD VIRTUAL R
[5]   Teamwork for Clinical Emergencies: Interprofessional Focus Group Analysis and Triangulation With Simulation [J].
Bristowe, Katherine ;
Siassakos, Dimitrios ;
Hambly, Helen ;
Angouri, Jo ;
Yelland, Andrew ;
Draycott, Timothy J. ;
Fox, Robert .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2012, 22 (10) :1383-1394
[6]   Resolving the 50-year debate around using and misusing Likert scales [J].
Carifio, James ;
Perla, Rocco .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2008, 42 (12) :1150-1152
[7]   Simulation in Medical School Education: Review for Emergency Medicine [J].
Chakravarthy, Bharath ;
ter Haar, Elizabeth ;
Bhat, Srinidhi Subraya ;
McCoy, Christopher Eric ;
Denmark, T. Kent ;
Lotfipour, Shahram .
WESTERN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2011, 12 (04) :461-466
[8]   Simulated patients versus manikins in acute-care scenarios [J].
Coffey, Frank ;
Tsuchiya, Keiko ;
Timmons, Stephen ;
Baxendale, Bryn ;
Adolphs, Svenja ;
Atkins, Sarah .
CLINICAL TEACHER, 2016, 13 (04) :257-261
[9]  
Davis M., 2017, How to Teach Using Simulation in Healthcare
[10]  
Dinet J, 2018, ACM INT C P SER, V323, P66