The Dynamics of Message Selection in Online Political Discussion Forums: Self-Segregation or Diverse Exposure?

被引:27
作者
Song, Hyunjin [1 ]
Cho, Jaeho [2 ]
Benefield, Grace A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Dept Commun, Rathausstr 19-1-9, A-1010 Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Commun, Commun, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
online political discussion; online discussion forum; message selection; partisan selectivity; cross-cutting exposure; temporal exponential random graph model; EXPONENTIAL FAMILY MODELS; INFORMATION; NETWORK; NEWS; COMMUNICATION; REINFORCEMENT; DISCOURSE; DEMOCRACY; IDEOLOGY; INTERNET;
D O I
10.1177/0093650218790144
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
While the online sphere is believed to expose individuals to a wider array of viewpoints, a worry about self-reinforcing political echo chambers also persists. We join this scholarly debate by focusing on individual motives for political discussion and dyadic- and structural-level mechanisms that can drive one's message-selection decision in online discussion settings. Using unobtrusively logged behavioral data matched with panel survey responses, our temporal exponential random graph model (TERGM) analysis indicates that message selection in online discussion settings is largely driven by the similarity of one's candidate evaluative criteria and various endogenous structural factors, whereas the impact of overt partisan preference in shaping message selection is much more limited than is often assumed.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 152
页数:28
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
Ahn T. K., 2014, EXPERTS ACTIVISTS IN
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL
[3]  
Anthony Downs., 1957, An economic theory of democracy
[4]   Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook [J].
Bakshy, Eytan ;
Messing, Solomon ;
Adamic, Lada A. .
SCIENCE, 2015, 348 (6239) :1130-1132
[5]   Emergence of scaling in random networks [J].
Barabási, AL ;
Albert, R .
SCIENCE, 1999, 286 (5439) :509-512
[6]   A New Era of Minimal Effects? The Changing Foundations of Political Communication [J].
Bennett, W. Lance ;
Iyengar, Shanto .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2008, 58 (04) :707-731
[7]   Multidimensional homophily in friendship networks [J].
Block, Per ;
Grund, Thomas .
NETWORK SCIENCE, 2014, 2 (02) :189-212
[8]   The Social Structure of Political Echo Chambers: Variation in Ideological Homophily in Online Networks [J].
Boutyline, Andrei ;
Willer, Robb .
POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 38 (03) :551-569
[9]   Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition [J].
Cacioppo, JT ;
Petty, RE ;
Feinstein, JA ;
Blair, W ;
Jarvis, G .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1996, 119 (02) :197-253
[10]   Candidate Vulnerability and Exposure to Counterattitudinal Information: Evidence From Two US Presidential Elections [J].
Carnahan, Dustin ;
Garrett, R. Kelly ;
Lynch, Emily K. .
HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2016, 42 (04) :577-598