An integrated constructed wetland to treat contaminants and nutrients from dairy farmyard dirty water

被引:85
作者
Dunne, EJ
Culleton, N
O'Donovan, G
Harrington, R
Olsen, AE
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Wetland Biogeochem Lab, Dept Soil & Water Sci, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Dept Environm Heritage & Local Govt, Natl Pks & Wildlife, Waterford, Ireland
[3] Univ Coll Dublin, Fac Agr, Dept Environm Resource Managment, Dublin, Ireland
[4] TEAGASC, Res Ctr, Wexford, Ireland
关键词
eutrophication; agriculture; farmyard dirty water; integrated constructed wetlands; Ireland;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2004.11.010
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Water pollution by agriculture can include inappropriately managed dairy farmyard dirty water. In Ireland, dairy farmyard dirty water includes farmyard runoff, parlour washings, and silage/farmyard manure effluents. The objectives of this study were to determine (i) the quality and quantity of dirty water generated at a farm-scale and (ii) the seasonal effectiveness of aconstructed wetland to treat farmyard dirty water. The wetland system was 4800 m(2) in area and treated dirty water from a 42-cow organic dairy unit with an open yard area of 2031 m(2). Monthly dirty water inflow rate to the wetland ranged between 3.6 and 18.5 m(3) d(-1). Farmyard dirty water accounted for 27% of hydrological inputs to the wetland, whereas rainfall on wetland, along with wetland bank inflows accounted for 45 and 28%, respectively. Farmyard dirty water quality and quantity did not vary with season. Yearly mass loads discharged to the wetland were 47 +/- 10 kg yr(-1) of soluble reactive phosphor-us (SRP), 128 +/- 35 kg yr(-1) of NH4+, 5484 +/- 1433 kg yr(-1) of organic material as measured by five-day biological oxygen demand (BOD5), and 1570 +/- 465 kg yr(-1) of total suspended solids (TSS). Phosphorus retention by the wetland varied with season (5-84%) with least amounts being retained during winter. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 234
页数:14
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, STAND METH EX WAT WA
[2]   A constructed surface flow wetland for treating agricultural waste waters [J].
Borin, M ;
Bonaiti, G ;
Santamaria, G ;
Giardini, L .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 44 (11-12) :523-530
[3]   Factors affecting phosphorus retention in small constructed wetlands treating agricultural non-point source pollution [J].
Braskerud, BC .
ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2002, 19 (01) :41-61
[4]   The influence of vegetation on sedimentation and resuspension of soil particles in small constructed wetlands [J].
Braskerud, BC .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2001, 30 (04) :1447-1457
[5]   Phosphorus sorption dynamics in soils and coupling with surface and pore water in riverine wetlands [J].
Bridgham, SD ;
Johnston, CA ;
Schubauer-Berigan, JP ;
Weishampel, P .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2001, 65 (02) :577-588
[6]  
Cathcart TP, 1994, CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS FOR ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT, PROCEEDINGS OF WORKSHOP, P9
[7]  
CLENAGHAN C, 2001, PHOSPHORUS REGULATIO
[8]   PEAT ACCRETION AND PHOSPHORUS ACCUMULATION ALONG A EUTROPHICATION GRADIENT IN THE NORTHERN EVERGLADES [J].
CRAFT, CB ;
RICHARDSON, CJ .
BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, 1993, 22 (02) :133-156
[9]   Constructed wetlands to treat wastewater from dairy and swine operations: A review [J].
Cronk, JK .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 1996, 58 (2-3) :97-114
[10]   Dirty water from dairy farms, I: biochemical characteristics [J].
Cumby, TR ;
Brewer, AJ ;
Dimmock, SJ .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 67 (02) :155-160