Empirical Scoring Functions for Structure-Based Virtual Screening: Applications, Critical Aspects, and Challenges

被引:159
作者
Guedes, Isabella A. [1 ]
Pereira, Felipe S. S. [1 ]
Dardenne, Laurent E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Lab Nacl Comp Cient, Grp Modelagem Mol Sistemas Biol, Petropolis, Brazil
关键词
structure-based drug design; molecular docking; virtual screening; scoring function; binding affinity prediction; machine learning; PROTEIN-LIGAND-BINDING; OUT CROSS-VALIDATION; AFFINITY PREDICTION; MOLECULAR DOCKING; COVALENT DOCKING; WATER-MOLECULES; DRUG DISCOVERY; RANDOM FOREST; FORCE-FIELD; WEB SERVER;
D O I
10.3389/fphar.2018.01089
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Structure-based virtual screening (VS) is a widely used approach that employs the knowledge of the three-dimensional structure of the target of interest in the design of new lead compounds from large-scale molecular docking experiments. Through the prediction of the binding mode and affinity of a small molecule within the binding site of the target of interest, it is possible to understand important properties related to the binding process. Empirical scoring functions are widely used for pose and affinity prediction. Although pose prediction is performed with satisfactory accuracy, the correct prediction of binding affinity is still a challenging task and crucial for the success of structure-based VS experiments. There are several efforts in distinct fronts to develop even more sophisticated and accurate models for filtering and ranking large libraries of compounds. This paper will cover some recent successful applications and methodological advances, including strategies to explore the ligand entropy and solvent effects, training with sophisticated machine-learning techniques, and the use of quantum mechanics. Particular emphasis will be given to the discussion of critical aspects and further directions for the development of more accurate empirical scoring functions.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 239 条
[41]   Ligand configurational entropy and protein binding [J].
Chang, Chia-en A. ;
Chen, Wei ;
Gilson, Michael K. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2007, 104 (05) :1534-1539
[42]   Efficient conformational sampling and weak scoring in docking programs? Strategy of the wisdom of crowds [J].
Chaput, Ludovic ;
Mouawad, Liliane .
JOURNAL OF CHEMINFORMATICS, 2017, 9
[43]   Benchmark of four popular virtual screening programs: construction of the active/decoy dataset remains a major determinant of measured performance [J].
Chaput, Ludovic ;
Martinez-Sanz, Juan ;
Saettel, Nicolas ;
Mouawad, Liliane .
JOURNAL OF CHEMINFORMATICS, 2016, 8 :1-17
[44]   Consensus scoring: A method for obtaining improved hit rates from docking databases of three-dimensional structures into proteins [J].
Charifson, PS ;
Corkery, JJ ;
Murcko, MA ;
Walters, WP .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 1999, 42 (25) :5100-5109
[45]   On-the-Fly QM/MM Docking with Attracting Cavities [J].
Chaskar, Prasad ;
Zoete, Vincent ;
Rohrig, Ute F. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2017, 57 (01) :73-84
[46]   Comparative Assessment of Scoring Functions on a Diverse Test Set [J].
Cheng, Tiejun ;
Li, Xun ;
Li, Yan ;
Liu, Zhihai ;
Wang, Renxiao .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2009, 49 (04) :1079-1093
[47]   Semiempirical Quantum Mechanical Methods for Noncovalent Interactions for Chemical and Biochemical Applications [J].
Christensen, Anders S. ;
Kubar, Tomas ;
Cui, Qiang ;
Elstner, Marcus .
CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 2016, 116 (09) :5301-5337
[48]  
Cole JC, 2011, METH PRIN MED CHEM, V48, P87
[49]   Variability in docking success rates due to dataset preparation [J].
Corbeil, Christopher R. ;
Williams, Christopher I. ;
Labute, Paul .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2012, 26 (06) :775-786
[50]   Paying the Price of Desolvation in Solvent-Exposed Protein Pockets: Impact of Distal Solubilizing Groups on Affinity and Binding Thermodynamics in a Series of Thermolysin Inhibitors [J].
Cramer, Jonathan ;
Krimmer, Stefan G. ;
Heine, Andreas ;
Klebe, Gerhard .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2017, 60 (13) :5791-5799