The environmental performance of protecting seedlings with plastic tree shelters for afforestation in temperate oceanic regions: A UK case study

被引:5
作者
Chau, Charnett [1 ,2 ]
Paulillo, Andrea [2 ]
Lu, Nancy [1 ]
Miodownik, Mark [1 ,3 ]
Lettieri, Paola [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] UCL, UCL Plast Waste Innovat Hub, London, England
[2] UCL, Dept Chem Engn, London, England
[3] UCL, Dept Mech Engn, London, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Life Cycle Assessment; Plastic tree shelters; Forestry management; Planting seedlings; Environmental impact; Climate change; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148239
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Restoration of forested land represents an effective strategy to achieve net-zero target emissions by enhancing the removal of greenhouse gases from the atmosphere. The most common afforestation strategy envisages planting seedlings, which are germinated and grown to the desired age at tree nurseries, with plastic shelters to increase growth and survival of trees. This article presents a comprehensive Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) study that compares the environmental performance of current and prospective scenarios for shelter-aided seedling planting compared with a base case where shelters are not employed. The study focuses on the UK, but results and conclusions are valid for other temperate oceanic regions. The scenarios investigated are a combination of different shelters materials and end-of-life (EoL) strategies. Our analysis demonstrates that (i) planting seedling without shelters is the most preferable option across most environmental impact categories (including Climate Change), and in terms of weighted results, (ii) polypropylene shelters are preferable to bio-based alternatives, including polylactic acid-starch blends and bio-polypropylene, (iii) recycling is the most environmentally advantageous EoL treatment. Our study also showed that that the carbon emissions of the scenarios investigated are negligible when compared to the amount of carbon sequestered by a tree in 25 years. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, EU Plastics Strategy of the European Commission
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ISO 14040 2006 ENV M, DOI DOI 10.1002/JTR
[3]   Life cycle assessment of the production and use of polypropylene tree shelters [J].
Arnold, J. C. ;
Alston, S. M. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2012, 94 (01) :1-12
[4]  
Barton B., 2014, WATER CLIMATE RISKS
[5]  
Boucher J, 2019, REV PLASTIC FOOTPRIN
[6]  
Cashmore S, 2010, PHOTODEGRADATION RES
[7]   Fostering natural forest regeneration on former agricultural land through economic and policy interventions [J].
Chazdon, Robin L. ;
Lindenmayer, David ;
Guariguata, Manuel R. ;
Crouzeilles, Renato ;
Rey Benayas, Jose Maria ;
Lazos Chavero, Elena .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 15 (04)
[8]   The application of Life Cycle Assessment to Integrated Solid Waste Management - Part 1 - Methodology [J].
Clift, R ;
Doig, A ;
Finnveden, G .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2000, 78 (B4) :279-287
[9]  
Committee on Climate Change, 2019, 269 COMM CLIM CHANG
[10]   The use of tree shelters in restoring forest species to a floodplain delta: 5-year results [J].
Conner, WH ;
Inabinette, LW ;
Brantley, EF .
ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2000, 15 :S47-S56