Detecting Management Fraud in Public Companies

被引:188
作者
Cecchini, Mark [1 ]
Aytug, Haldun [2 ]
Koehler, Gary J. [2 ]
Pathak, Praveen [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Carolina, Sch Accounting, Darla Moore Sch Business, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Warrington Coll Business Adm, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
management fraud; classification; support vector machines; financial event detection; kernel methods; EXPERIENCE; FREQUENCY; EARNINGS; DEFAULT; RISK;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.1100.1174
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper provides a methodology for detecting management fraud using basic financial data. The methodology is based on support vector machines. An important aspect therein is a kernel that increases the power of the learning machine by allowing an implicit and generally nonlinear mapping of points, usually into a higher dimensional feature space. A kernel specific to the domain of finance is developed. This financial kernel constructs features shown in prior research to be helpful in detecting management fraud. A large empirical data set was collected, which included quantitative financial attributes for fraudulent and nonfraudulent public companies. Support vector machines using the financial kernel correctly labeled 80% of the fraudulent cases and 90.6% of the nonfraudulent cases on a holdout set. Furthermore, we replicate other leading fraud research studies using our data and find that our method has the highest accuracy on fraudulent cases and competitive accuracy on nonfraudulent cases. The results validate the financial kernel together with support vector machines as a useful method for discriminating between fraudulent and nonfraudulent companies using only publicly available quantitative financial attributes. The results also show that the methodology has predictive value because, using only historical data, it was able to distinguish fraudulent from nonfraudulent companies in subsequent years.
引用
收藏
页码:1146 / 1160
页数:15
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Audit committee characteristics and restatements [J].
Abbott, LJ ;
Parker, S ;
Peters, GF .
AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2004, 23 (01) :69-87
[2]  
Agresti A., 1990, CATEGORICAL DATA ANA
[3]  
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), 2002, AU Section 316: Consideration of fraud in a financial statement audit
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, KERNEL METHODS PATTE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005, STANDARD POORS COMPU
[6]  
[Anonymous], J MACHINE LEARNING R
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation
[8]  
[Anonymous], FIN NYSE CORP GOV RU
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2001, 475 SFB TU DORTM
[10]   The effectiveness of alternative risk assessment and program planning tools in a fraud setting [J].
Asare, SK ;
Wright, AM .
CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2004, 21 (02) :325-352