Contemporary labor patterns: the impact of maternal body mass index

被引:146
作者
Kominiarek, Michelle A. [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Jun [3 ]
VanVeldhuisen, Paul [5 ]
Troendle, James [4 ]
Beaver, Julie
Hibbard, Judith U. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Indiana Univ Sch Med Clarian Hlth, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Indianapolis, IN USA
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Xinhua Hosp, Shanghai Key Lab Childrens Environm Hlth, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
[4] NHLBI, Div Cardiovasc Sci, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[5] EMMES Corp, Rockville, MD USA
关键词
body mass index; labor curves; obesity; pregnancy; CESAREAN DELIVERY; OBESITY; RISK; PROGRESSION; WEIGHT; CONTRACTILITY; ASSOCIATION; PREGNANCY; DURATION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.014
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare labor patterns by body mass index (BMI). STUDY DESIGN: A total of 118,978 gravidas with a singleton term cephalic gestation were studied. Repeated-measures analysis constructed mean labor curves by parity and BMI categories for those who reached 10 cm. Interval-censored regression analysis determined median traverse times, adjusting for covariates in vaginal deliveries and intrapartum cesareans. RESULTS: In the labor curves, the time difference to reach 10 cm was 1.2 hours from the lowest to highest BMI category for nulliparas. Multiparas entered active phase by 6 cm, but reaching this point took longer for BMI >= 40.0 (3.4 hours) compared to BMI <25.0 (2.4 hours). Progression by centimeter (P < .001 for nulliparas) and from 4-10 cm (P < .001 for nulliparas and multiparas) increased as BMI increased. Second stage length, with and without an epidural, was similar among BMI categories for nulliparas (P > .05) but decreased as BMI increased for multiparas (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Labor proceeds more slowly as BMI increases, suggesting that labor management be altered to allow longer time for these differences.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics, 2003, Obstet Gynecol, V102, P1445
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, WHO TECH REP SER, V894, pi
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, OBSTET GYNECOL, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.AJOG.2010.04.035
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, NAT VIT STAT REP WEB, V59
[5]   Linear association between maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index and risk of caesarean section in term deliveries [J].
Barau, G. ;
Robillard, P-Y ;
Hulsey, T. C. ;
Dedecker, F. ;
Laffite, A. ;
Gerardin, P. ;
Kauffmann, E. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2006, 113 (10) :1173-1177
[6]   Intrauterine pressure during the second stage of labor in obese women [J].
Buhimschi, CS ;
Buhimschi, IA ;
Malinow, AM ;
Weiner, CP .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 103 (02) :225-230
[7]   Prepregnancy weight and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes [J].
Cnattingius, S ;
Bergström, R ;
Lipworth, L ;
Kramer, MS .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 338 (03) :147-152
[8]  
Crowder KJ., 1990, ANAL REPEATED MEASUR
[9]   Prevalence and Trends in Obesity Among US Adults, 1999-2008 [J].
Flegal, Katherine M. ;
Carroll, Margaret D. ;
Ogden, Cynthia L. ;
Curtin, Lester R. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 303 (03) :235-241
[10]   THE GRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF LABOR [J].
FRIEDMAN, EA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1954, 68 (06) :1568-1575