Return to Duty Rates in Active Duty Service Members After Elective Surgery of the Lumbar Spine

被引:6
作者
Lunsford, Jason G. [1 ]
Lawson, Bryan K. [1 ]
Johnson, Anthony E. [1 ]
Topp, Raymond F. [1 ]
机构
[1] San Antonio Mil Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed & Rehabil, 3551 Roger Brooke Dr, Ft Sam Houston, TX 78234 USA
关键词
LOW-BACK-PAIN; INTERBODY FUSION; UNITED-STATES; POSTERIOR; COMPLICATIONS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; ANTERIOR;
D O I
10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00216
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: The aim of this study is to define the percentage of military service members returned to active duty following elective lumbar spine surgery. Methods: We reviewed 331 elective lumbar spine procedures performed on active duty service members over a 5-year period. All patients underwent a decompressive lumbar procedure with or without fusion. Return to duty (RTD) was our primary outcome, defined as no referral to a Medical Evaluation Board by the 12-month postoperative follow-up visit. All subject's final disposition was recorded as a binomial distribution and stratified by demographic parameters. Subgroup analysis comparing the return rates for specific procedures was performed. Results: 232 patients met our study inclusion criteria. 136 underwent isolated decompressive procedures and 96 patients underwent fusion procedures. The overall RTD rate following elective lumbar spine surgery was 64% (n = 149) (95% confidence interval, CI [58, 70]). The RTD rate for isolated decompressive procedures was 63% (n = 86) (95% CI [55, 71]), and 66% (n = 63) (95% CI [56, 75]) after decompression with lumbar fusion. Conclusions: The RTD rate following elective lumbar spine surgery is 64%. When stratified by procedure type, isolated decompression procedures (63% RTD rate) and fusion procedures (66% RTD rate) displayed similar results.
引用
收藏
页码:572 / 576
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain [J].
Andersson, GBJ .
LANCET, 1999, 354 (9178) :581-585
[2]   Endoscopic lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine [J].
Bergey, DL ;
Villavicencio, AT ;
Goldstein, T ;
Regan, JJ .
SPINE, 2004, 29 (15) :1681-1688
[3]   Spine-area pain in military personnel: a review of epidemiology, etiology, diagnosis, and treatment [J].
Cohen, Steven P. ;
Gallagher, Rollin M. ;
Davis, Shelton A. ;
Griffith, Scott R. ;
Carragee, Eugene J. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2012, 12 (09) :833-842
[4]   INCREASING RATES OF CERVICAL AND LUMBAR SPINE SURGERY IN THE UNITED-STATES, 1979-1990 [J].
DAVIS, H .
SPINE, 1994, 19 (10) :1117-1124
[5]   United States trends in lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions [J].
Deyo, RA ;
Gray, DT ;
Kreuter, W ;
Mirza, S ;
Martin, BI .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (12) :1441-1445
[6]  
Dickman RD, 2006, ORTHOPAEDIC KNOWLEDG, P319
[7]   Posterior lumbar interbody fusion [J].
DiPaola, Christian P. ;
Molinari, Robert W. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2008, 16 (03) :130-139
[8]   Minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion [J].
Eck, Jason C. ;
Hodges, Scott ;
Humphreys, S. Craig .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2007, 15 (06) :321-329
[9]   Complications of posterior lumbar interbody fusion when using a titanium threaded cage device [J].
Elias, WJ ;
Simmons, NE ;
Kaptain, GJ ;
Chadduck, JB ;
Whitehill, R .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2000, 93 (01) :45-52
[10]  
FRYMOYER JW, 1991, ORTHOP CLIN N AM, V22, P263