MHealth Applications for Hearing Loss: A Scoping Review

被引:19
作者
Frisby, Caitlin [1 ]
Eikelboom, Robert [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Mahomed-Asmail, Faheema [1 ]
Kuper, Hannah [4 ]
Swanepoel, De Wet [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pretoria, Dept Speech Language Pathol & Audiol, Lynnwood Rd & Roper St, ZA-0002 Pretoria, South Africa
[2] Ear Sci Inst Australia, Subiaco, WA, Australia
[3] Univ Western Australia, Med Sch, Ear Sci Ctr, Nedlands, WA, Australia
[4] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Int Ctr Evidence Disabil, London, England
关键词
m-health; hearing loss; hearing impairment; mobile phone; hearing services; SMARTPHONE; TECHNOLOGY; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1089/tmj.2021.0460
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Mobile health (m-health) has the potential to improve access and uptake of health services globally. Noncommunicable diseases such as hearing loss have seen increasing use of m-health approaches to improve access, scalability, penetration, quality, and convenience of health services. This scoping review describes published research in m-health supported hearing health care services across the continuum of care.Methods: A search on Scopus, MEDLINE (PubMed), and Web of Science for articles published up to July 2, 2021 was conducted. Articles in which m-health was used across a continuum of care where the primary focus was hearing health care were included. A narrative synthesis was conducted.Results: One hundred forty-six articles meeting the inclusion criteria were included in data extraction. High-income countries contributed 56% of articles, upper-middle countries 32%, lower-middle countries 8%, and low-income countries 4%. Articles identified included promotion (2%), screening (39%), diagnosis (35%), treatment (10%), and support (14%) for hearing loss. m-Health applications in high-income countries were more represented in diagnosis (62% vs. 38%), treatment (67% vs. 33%), and support (82% vs. 18%) compared with low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) except for screening (64% vs. 36%). Few studies focussed on hearing health promotion across all income brackets.Conclusions: m-Health supported hearing health care services are available across a continuum of care and various world regions, although more prevalent in high-income countries. Although great potential is demonstrated, implementation evaluations are important to further validate its widespread use and potential to make services for hearing loss more accessible in LMICs.
引用
收藏
页码:1090 / 1099
页数:10
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
American Academy of Pediatrics JCoIH, 2017, PEDIATRICS, V120, P898
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, WHO Deafness and hearing loss
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Multi-country assessment of national capacity to provide hearing care
[4]  
Aranda-Jan C., 2020, Mob Disabil Gap Rep., P4
[5]  
Blazer D.G., 2016, Hearing health care for adults: Priorities for improving access and affordability, DOI DOI 10.17226/23446
[6]  
Boothroyd Arthur, 2007, Trends Amplif, V11, P63, DOI 10.1177/1084713807301073
[7]   Community Health Workers and Mobile Technology: A Systematic Review of the Literature [J].
Braun, Rebecca ;
Catalani, Caricia ;
Wimbush, Julian ;
Israelski, Dennis .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (06)
[8]   Diagnostic accuracy of non-specialist versus specialist health workers in diagnosing hearing loss and ear disease in Malawi [J].
Bright, Tess ;
Mulwafu, Wakisa ;
Phiri, Mwanaisha ;
Ensink, Robbert J. H. ;
Smith, Andrew ;
Yip, Jennifer ;
Mactaggart, Islay ;
Polack, Sarah .
TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH, 2019, 24 (07) :817-828
[9]   The world report on hearing, 2021 [J].
Chadha, Shelly ;
Kamenov, Kaloyan ;
Cieza, Alarcos .
BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2021, 99 (04) :242-+
[10]   Technology for hearing loss - as We Know it, and as We Dream it [J].
Clark, Jackie L. ;
Swanepoel, De Wet .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION-ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 9 (05) :408-413