Prospective Analysis of the Trial Period for Spinal Cord Stimulation Treatment for Chronic Pain

被引:28
作者
Chincholkar, Mahindra [1 ]
Eldabe, Sam [1 ]
Strachan, Roger [2 ]
Brookes, Morag [1 ]
Garner, Fay [1 ]
Chadwick, Raymond [3 ]
Gulve, Ashish [1 ]
Ness, Jill [4 ]
机构
[1] James Cook Univ Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia & Pain Management, Middlesbrough TS4 3BW, Cleveland, England
[2] James Cook Univ Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Middlesbrough TS4 3BW, Cleveland, England
[3] James Cook Univ Hosp, Pain Management Serv, Middlesbrough TS4 3BW, Cleveland, England
[4] Univ Hosp N Tees, Pain Management Serv, Stockton On Tees, England
来源
NEUROMODULATION | 2011年 / 14卷 / 06期
关键词
Chronic pain; infection; prospective nonrandomized study; spinal cord stimulation; trial; CHRONIC BENIGN PAIN; INTRACTABLE PAIN; MULTICENTER; BACK; EXPERIENCE; RELIEF;
D O I
10.1111/j.1525-1403.2011.00384.x
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine patient preferences regarding the duration of trial period. Materials and Methods: Forty patients were given a trial of spinal cord stimulation. They were questioned daily if they would like to proceed to a permanent implant. Three consecutive affirmative answers implied a successful trial; three negative replies implied a failed trial. Patients rated daily the pain from the surgery, original pain, satisfaction with the stimulator, and the duration of the use of the stimulator. Results: The trial duration varied from 3 to 15 days. Patients with a failed trial took longer to make a decision and also experienced prolonged surgical pain. The majority of patients with a successful trial experienced more than 50% pain reduction. The rate of infection was 7.5%, which has reduced to 2.8% after changing the dressing protocol. Conclusions: In this study, all patients could make a decision in 15 days, with successful trials requiring a shorter duration. The conversion rate was similar to rates in literature despite patients making a decision without physician input.
引用
收藏
页码:523 / 528
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Abejon David, 2007, Pain Physician, V10, P533
[2]   Prospective, multicenter study of spinal cord stimulation for relief of chronic back and extremity pain [J].
Burchiel, KJ ;
Anderson, VC ;
Brown, FD ;
Fessler, RG ;
Friedman, WA ;
Pelofsky, S ;
Weiner, RL ;
Oakley, J ;
Shatin, D .
SPINE, 1996, 21 (23) :2786-2794
[3]   Safety and efficacy of spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain: a 20-year literature review [J].
Cameron, T .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2004, 100 (03) :254-267
[4]  
Hill R, 2008, NICE TECHNOLOGY APPR
[5]  
Kuechmann C, 2009, COULD AUTOMATIC POSI
[6]   Spinal cord stimulation in treatment of chronic benign pain: Challenges in treatment planning and present status, a 22-year experience [J].
Kumar, K ;
Hunter, G ;
Demeria, D .
NEUROSURGERY, 2006, 58 (03) :481-494
[7]  
Kumar K, 2007, ACTA NEUROCHIR SUPPL, V97, P91
[8]   Spinal cord stimulation versus conventional medical management for neuropathic pain: A multicentre randomised controlled trial in patients with failed back surgery syndrome [J].
Kumar, Krishna ;
Taylor, Rod S. ;
Jacques, Line ;
Eldabe, Sam ;
Meglio, Mario ;
Molet, Joan ;
Thomson, Simon ;
O'Callaghan, Jim ;
Eisenberg, Elon ;
Milbouw, Germain ;
Buchser, Eric ;
Fortim, Gianpaolo ;
Richardson, Jonathan ;
North, Richard B. .
PAIN, 2007, 132 (1-2) :179-188
[9]  
Medtronic, RESTORESENSOR
[10]  
MEGLIO M, 1994, STEREOT FUNCT NEUROS, V62, P263, DOI 10.1159/000098630