Coordination of policy goals between renewable portfolio standards and carbon caps: A quantitative assessment in China

被引:83
作者
Yi, Bo-Wen [1 ]
Xu, Jin-Hua [2 ,3 ]
Fan, Ying [1 ]
机构
[1] Beihang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[2] North China Elect Power Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Sci & Dev, Ctr Energy & Environm Policy Res, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Renewable portfolio standards; Carbon cap; Policy coordination; Optimization; EMISSIONS TRADING SCHEME; GREEN CERTIFICATE MARKET; CO2; EMISSIONS; INTENSITY REDUCTION; ELECTRICITY SECTOR; ENERGY DEVELOPMENT; POWER-GENERATION; CEMENT INDUSTRY; TARGET; INVESTMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.12.015
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
China has planned to implement renewable portfolio standards (RPS) and national carbon cap-and-trade to promote the low-carbon transformation of society. How to design and coordinate the goals of these policies becomes a key issue. This study quantitatively evaluates the effects of RPS and carbon caps in China's power sector using a multi-regional power optimization model combining with decomposition method. Based on the framework, this study focuses on two questions: (1) How to coordinate policy goals of RPS and carbon caps to ensure the effectiveness of each policy in the face of policy overlapping? (2) How to design power generation and transmission planning to achieve the goals of different policy mixes? Results show that these two policies contain overlapping elements, yet remain different impacts on regional power structures, inter-regional power and coal dispatches. An effective policy interval for RPS and carbon caps is estimated to examine the effectiveness of any policy mixes. If an RPS with a 17% non-hydro renewable share is implemented by 2030, the effective interval of carbon caps will be between a 27.5% and 38.2% reduction in carbon intensity. Results support that there are strong inner linkages between reasonable power system planning and current status of policy mix.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 35
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Factorizing changes in energy and environmental indicators through decomposition [J].
Ang, BW ;
Zhang, FQ ;
Choi, KH .
ENERGY, 1998, 23 (06) :489-495
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11027-006-9069-Y
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, US CHIN JOINT ANN CL
[4]   Evaluating renewable portfolio standards and carbon cap scenarios in the US electric sector [J].
Bird, Lori ;
Chapman, Caroline ;
Logan, Jeff ;
Sumner, Jenny ;
Short, Walter .
ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (05) :2573-2585
[5]   Renewable energy and policy options in an integrated ASEAN electricity market: Quantitative assessments and policy implications [J].
Chang, Youngho ;
Li, Yanfei .
ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 85 :39-49
[6]   Global non-fossil fuel consumption: driving factors, disparities, and trends [J].
Chen, Jiandong ;
Wu, Yinyin ;
Xu, Chong ;
Song, Malin ;
Liu, Xin .
MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2019, 57 (04) :791-810
[7]   A multi-region optimization planning model for China's power sector [J].
Cheng, Rui ;
Xu, Zhaofeng ;
Liu, Pei ;
Wang, Zhe ;
Li, Zheng ;
Jones, Ian .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 137 :413-426
[8]  
China Electricity Council (CEC), 2018, RUNN SIT POW IND 201
[9]   How will the emissions trading scheme save cost for achieving China's 2020 carbon intensity reduction target? [J].
Cui, Lian-Biao ;
Fan, Ying ;
Zhu, Lei ;
Bi, Qing-Hua .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 136 :1043-1052
[10]   Exploring the Schemes for Green Climate Fund Financing: International Lessons [J].
Cui, Lianbiao ;
Huang, Yuran .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 101 :173-187