Job access, location decision, and the working poor: A qualitative study in the Columbus, Ohio metropolitan area

被引:37
作者
Boschmann, E. Eric [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Denver, Dept Geog, Denver, CO 80208 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Job accessibility; Working poor; Location decision; Metropolitan; Columbus; Ohio; Qualitative; SPATIAL MISMATCH; EMPLOYMENT; SEARCH; TRANSPORTATION; ACCESSIBILITY; GEOGRAPHY; WELFARE; RACE; SEGREGATION; MOBILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.06.005
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
The critical perspective in job accessibility research argues that access to employment opportunities in an urban area is a complex process. This paper explores the role of individual level location decision-making as it relates to job access. In US metropolitan areas, a worker must consider where to live, where to work, and how they will commute between these locations - the residential-commuting-employment nexus. But limited work has been done to understand how this home-work link influences job access. This research interviews thirty working poor individuals in the Columbus, Ohio metropolitan area. One unexpected finding was the spatially transitory nature of these individuals' lives - frequently changing both jobs and residences. Negotiating the nexus is a process of spatial decision-making determined by their individual urban mobility. Residential choice is made based on mobility options, not work location. They have diverse job commuting experiences as their mobility options change over time, and those mobility options often dictate their capacity to access existing job opportunities. From the experience of these individuals, Columbus has a strong local economy with many low-skilled higher paying jobs, but a weak public transit system. This article also contributes a qualitative based research perspective to a body of literature that historically under utilizes the approach. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:671 / 682
页数:12
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
Alonso William., 1964, Location and land use. Toward a general theory of land rent.
[2]   Spatial and skills mismatch for labor-market segments [J].
Bauder, H ;
Perle, E .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A, 1999, 31 (06) :959-977
[3]   Reflections on the spatial mismatch debate [J].
Bauder, H .
JOURNAL OF PLANNING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, 2000, 19 (03) :316-320
[4]  
Bazeley P., 2007, Qualitative data analysis with NVivo
[5]   Beyond the spatial mismatch: Welfare recipients and transportation policy [J].
Blumenberg, E ;
Manville, M .
JOURNAL OF PLANNING LITERATURE, 2004, 19 (02) :182-205
[6]   METROPOLITAN AREA JOB ACCESSIBILITY AND THE WORKING POOR: EXPLORING LOCAL SPATIAL VARIATIONS OF GEOGRAPHIC CONTEXT [J].
Boschmann, E. Eric ;
Kwan, Mei-Po .
URBAN GEOGRAPHY, 2010, 31 (04) :498-522
[7]   Moving places: the geography of warehousing in the US [J].
Bowen, John T., Jr. .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2008, 16 (06) :379-387
[8]  
Brown L.A., 1970, GEOGR ANN, V52B, P1, DOI [10.1080/04353684.1970.11879340, DOI 10.1080/04353684.1970.11879340]
[10]  
Cervero R., 2006, Making Do: How Working Families in Seven us Metropolitan Areas Trade off Housing Costs and Commuting Times