Life cycle assessment (LCA) of solid waste management strategies in Tehran: landfill and composting plus landfill

被引:77
作者
Abduli, M. A. [1 ]
Naghib, Abolghasem [1 ]
Yonesi, Mansoor [1 ]
Akbari, Ali [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran, Dept Environm Engn, Grad Fac Environm, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Composting; Landfilling; Tehran; SCENARIOS; SYSTEMS; CITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10661-010-1707-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As circumstances of operating and maintenance activities for landfilling and composting in Tehran metropolis differ from those of cities in developed countries, it was concluded to have an environmental impact comparison between the current solid waste management (MSW) strategies: (1) landfill, and (2) composting plus landfill. Life cycle assessment (LCA) was used to compare these scenarios for MSW in Tehran, Iran. The Eco-Indicator 99 is applied as an impact assessment method considering surplus energy, climate change, acidification, respiratory effect, carcinogenesis, ecotoxicity and ozone layer depletion points of aspects. One ton of municipal solid waste of Tehran was selected as the functional unit. According to the comparisons, the composting plus landfill scenario causes less damage to human health in comparison to landfill scenario. However, its damages to both mineral and fossil resources as well as ecosystem quality are higher than the landfill scenario. Thus, the composting plus landfill scenario had a higher environmental impact than landfill scenario. However, an integrated waste management will ultimately be the most efficient approach in terms of both environmental and economic benefits. In this paper, a cost evaluation shows that the unit cost per ton of waste for the scenarios is 15.28 and 26.40 US$, respectively. Results show landfill scenario as the preferable option both in environmental and economic aspects for Tehran in the current situation.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 498
页数:12
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Abduli MA, 2008, INT J ENVIRON RES, V2, P425
[2]  
ABDULI MA, 1995, WASTE MANAGE RES, V13, P519
[3]  
[Anonymous], ECOINDICATOR99 DAMAG
[4]   Environmental performance review and cost analysis of MSW landfilling by baling-wrapping technology versus conventional system [J].
Baldasano, JM ;
Gassó, S ;
Pérez, C .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2003, 23 (09) :795-806
[5]   Life cycle assessment of solid waste management options for Eskisehir, Turkey [J].
Banar, Mufide ;
Cokaygil, Zerrin ;
Ozkan, Aysun .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2009, 29 (01) :54-62
[6]   An assessment of bioreactor landfill costs and benefits [J].
Berge, Nicole D. ;
Reinhart, Debra R. ;
Batarseh, Eyad S. .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2009, 29 (05) :1558-1567
[7]   Alternative scenarios to meet the demands of sustainable waste management [J].
Bovea, MD ;
Powell, JC .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2006, 79 (02) :115-132
[8]   LCA of integrated MSW management systems: Case study of the bologna district [J].
Buttol, P. ;
Masoni, P. ;
Bonoli, A. ;
Goldoni, S. ;
Belladonna, V. ;
Cavazzuti, C. .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2007, 27 (08) :1059-1070
[9]   Life cycle assessment (LCA) of waste management strategies: Landfilling, sorting plant and incineration [J].
Cherubini, Francesco ;
Bargigli, Silvia ;
Ulgiati, Sergio .
ENERGY, 2009, 34 (12) :2116-2123
[10]   Municipal solid waste management in Tehran: Current practices, opportunities and challenges [J].
Damghani, Abdolmajid Mahdavi ;
Savarypour, Gholamreza ;
Zand, Eskandar ;
Deihimfard, Reza .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2008, 28 (05) :929-934