Noradrenergic terminals are the primary source of α2-adrenoceptor mediated dopamine release in the medial prefrontal cortex

In various psychiatric disorders, deficits in dopaminergic activity in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) are implicated. Treatments involving selective augmentation of dopaminergic activity in the PFC primarily depend on the inhibition of alpha(2)-adrenoreceptors singly or in combination with the inhibition of the norepinephrine transporter (NET). We aimed to clarify the relative contribution of dopamine (DA) release from noradrenergic and dopaminergic terminals to DA output induced by blockade of alpha(2)-adrenoreceptors and NET. To this end, we assessed whether central noradrenergic denervation modified catecholamine output in the medial PFC (mPFC) of rats elicited by atipamezole (an alpha(2)-adrenoreceptor antagonist), nisoxetine (an NET inhibitor), or their combination. Intraventricular administration of anti-dopamine-beta-hydroxylase-saporin (aDBH) caused a loss of DBH-positive fibers in the mPFC and almost total depletion of tissue and extracellular NE level; however, it did not reduce tissue DA level but increased extracellular DA level by 70% in the mPFC. Because noradrenergic denervation should have caused a loss of NET and reduced NE level at alpha(2)-adrenoceptors, the actual effect of an aDBH-induced lesion on DA output elicited by blockade of alpha(2)-adrenoceptors and NET was evaluated by comparing denervated and control rats following blockade of alpha(2)-adrenoceptors and NET with atipamezole and nisoxetine, respectively. In the control rats, extracellular NE and DA levels increased by approximately 150% each with 3 mg/kg atipamezole; 450% and 230%, respectively, with 3 mg/kg nisoxetine; and 2100% and 600%, respectively, with combined atipamezole and nisoxetine. In the denervated rats, consistent with the loss of NET, nisoxetine failed to modify extracellular DA level, whereas atipamezole, despite the lack of NE-induced stimulation of alpha(2)-adrenoceptors, increased extracellular DA level by approximately 30%. Overall, these results suggest that atipamezole-induced DA release mainly originated from noradrenergic terminals, possibly through the inhibition of alpha(2)-autoreceptors. Furthermore, while systemic and local administration of the alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonist clonidine into the mPFC of the controls rats reduced extracellular NE level by 80% and 60%, respectively, and extracellular DA level by 50% and 60%, respectively, it failed to reduce DA output in the denervated rats, consistent with the loss of alpha(2)-autoreceptors. To eliminate the possibility that denervation reduced DA release potential via the effects at dopaminergic terminals in the mPFC, the effect of systemic administration of the D-2-DA antagonist raclopride (0.5 mg/kg IP) on DA output was analyzed. In the control rats, raclopride was found to be ineffective when administered alone, but it increased extracellular DA level by 380% following NET inhibition with nisoxetine. In the denervated rats, as expected due to the loss of NET, raclopride-alone or with nisoxetine-increased DA release to approximately the same level as that observed in the control rats after NET inhibition. Overall, these results suggest that noradrenergic terminals in the mPFC are the primary source of DA released by blockade of alpha(2)-adrenoreceptors and NET and that alpha(2)-autoreceptors, and not alpha(2)-heteroreceptors, mediate DA output induced by alpha(2)-adrenoceptor blockade.