Prediction of Critical Care Outcome for Adult Patients Presenting to Emergency Department Using Initial Triage Information: An XGBoost Algorithm Analysis

被引:16
作者
Yun, Hyoungju [1 ]
Choi, Jinwook [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Park, Jeong Ho [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Interdisciplinary Program Med Informat, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Biomed Engn, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Med Res Ctr, Inst Med & Biol Engn, 103 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Emergency Med, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Biomed Res Inst, Lab Emergency Med Serv, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
triage; critical care; prediction; XGBoost; explainable machine learning; interpretable artificial intelligence; machine learning; algorithm; outcome; emergency; classify; prioritize; risk; model; MODELS; CALIBRATION; ADMISSION; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.2196/30770
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The emergency department (ED) triage system to classify and prioritize patients from high risk to less urgent continues to be a challenge. Objective: This study, comprising 80,433 patients, aims to develop a machine learning algorithm prediction model of critical care outcomes for adult patients using information collected during ED triage and compare the performance with that of the baseline model using the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS). Methods: To predict the need for critical care, we used 13 predictors from triage information: age, gender, mode of ED arrival, the time interval between onset and ED arrival, reason of ED visit, chief complaints, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate, respiratory rate, body temperature, oxygen saturation, and level of consciousness. The baseline model with KTAS was developed using logistic regression, and the machine learning model with 13 variables was generated using extreme gradient boosting (XGB) and deep neural network (DNN) algorithms. The discrimination was measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve. The ability of calibration with Hosmer-Lemeshow test and reclassification with net reclassification index were evaluated. The calibration plot and partial dependence plot were used in the analysis. Results: The AUROC of the model with the full set of variables (0.833-0.861) was better than that of the baseline model (0.796). The XGB model of AUROC 0.861 (95% CI 0.848-0.874) showed a higher discriminative performance than the DNN model of 0.833 (95% CI 0.819-0.848). The XGB and DNN models proved better reclassification than the baseline model with a positive net reclassification index. The XGB models were well-calibrated (Hosmer-Lemeshow test; P>.05); however, the DNN showed poor calibration power (Hosmer-Lemeshow test; P<.001). We further interpreted the nonlinear association between variables and critical care prediction. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that the performance of the XGB model using initial information at ED triage for predicting patients in need of critical care outperformed the conventional model with KTAS.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Discrimination and Calibration of Clinical Prediction Models Users' Guides to the Medical Literature [J].
Alba, Ana Carolina ;
Agoritsas, Thomas ;
Walsh, Michael ;
Hanna, Steven ;
Iorio, Alfonso ;
Devereaux, P. J. ;
McGinn, Thomas ;
Guyatt, Gordon .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 318 (14) :1377-1384
[2]  
Cava William La, 2019, AMIA Annu Symp Proc, V2019, P572
[3]   Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Korean Triage and Acuity Scale Level in Emergency Department Patients [J].
Choi, Sae Won ;
Ko, Taehoon ;
Hong, Ki Jeong ;
Kim, Kyung Hwan .
HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS RESEARCH, 2019, 25 (04) :305-312
[4]   A systematic review shows no performance benefit of machine learning over logistic regression for clinical prediction models [J].
Christodoulou, Evangelia ;
Ma, Jie ;
Collins, Gary S. ;
Steyerberg, Ewout W. ;
Verbakel, Jan Y. ;
Van Calster, Ben .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 110 :12-22
[5]   External validation of multivariable prediction models: a systematic review of methodological conduct and reporting [J].
Collins, Gary S. ;
de Groot, Joris A. ;
Dutton, Susan ;
Omar, Omar ;
Shanyinde, Milensu ;
Tajar, Abdelouahid ;
Voysey, Merryn ;
Wharton, Rose ;
Yu, Ly-Mee ;
Moons, Karel G. ;
Altman, Douglas G. .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2014, 14
[6]   Prediction of recidivism in a long-term follow-up of forensic psychiatric patients: Incremental effects of neuroimaging data [J].
Delfin, Carl ;
Krona, Hedvig ;
Andine, Peter ;
Ryding, Erik ;
Wallinius, Marta ;
Hofvander, Bjorn .
PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (05)
[7]   AN ELECTRONIC EMERGENCY TRIAGE SYSTEM TO IMPROVE PATIENT DISTRIBUTION BY CRITICAL OUTCOMES [J].
Dugas, Andrea Freyer ;
Kirsch, Thomas D. ;
Toerper, Matthew ;
Korley, Fred ;
Yenokyan, Gayane ;
France, Daniel ;
Hager, David ;
Levin, Scott .
JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 50 (06) :910-918
[8]   Using extreme gradient boosting to identify origin of replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae via hybrid features [J].
Duyen Thi Do ;
Nguyen Quoc Khanh Le .
GENOMICS, 2020, 112 (03) :2445-2451
[9]   An Interdepartmental Care Model to Expedite Admission from the Emergency Department to the Medical ICU [J].
Elliott, Daniel J. ;
Williams, Kimberly D. ;
Wu, Pan ;
Kher, Hemant, V ;
Michalec, Barret ;
Reinbold, Natalie ;
Coletti, Christian M. ;
Patel, Badrish J. ;
Dressler, Robert M. .
JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY AND PATIENT SAFETY, 2015, 41 (12) :542-549
[10]   On the interpretability of machine learning-based model for predicting hypertension [J].
Elshawi, Radwa ;
Al-Mallah, Mouaz H. ;
Sakr, Sherif .
BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2019, 19 (1)