A Comparative Biomechanical Analysis of Stand Alone Versus Facet Screw and Pedicle Screw Augmented Lateral Interbody Arthrodesis: An In Vitro Human Cadaveric Model

被引:17
|
作者
Kretzer, Ryan M. [1 ,2 ]
Molina, Camilo [3 ]
Hu, Nianbin [2 ]
Umekoji, Hidemasa [2 ]
Baaj, Ali A. [4 ]
Serhan, Hassan [5 ]
Cunningham, Bryan W. [2 ]
机构
[1] St Josephs Hosp, Western Neurosurg Ltd, 6567 E Carondelet Dr,Suite 305, Tucson, AZ 85710 USA
[2] St Joseph Med Ctr, Orthopaed Spinal Res Lab, Towson, MD USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurosurg, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[4] Univ Arizona, Med Ctr, Div Neurosurg, Tucson, AZ USA
[5] DePuy Spine, Raynham, MA USA
来源
CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY | 2016年 / 29卷 / 07期
关键词
facet screws; pedicle screws; lateral interbody fusion; TRANSLAMINAR FACET; LUMBAR FUSION; COMPLICATIONS; FIXATION; OUTCOMES; SCOLIOSIS; SURGERY; SPINE;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182868ef9
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design:Cadaveric biomechanical study.Objective:To investigate the kinematic response of a stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody cage compared with supplemental posterior fixation with either facet or pedicle screws after lateral discectomy.Summary of Background Data:Lateral interbody fusion is a promising minimally invasive fixation technique for lumbar interbody arthrodesis. The biomechanical stability of stand-alone cage placement compared with supplemental posterior fixation with either facet or bilateral pedicle screws remains unclear.Methods:A 6-degree of freedom spine simulator was used to test flexibility in 7 human cadaveric specimens. Flexion-extension, lateral-bending, and axial-rotation were tested in the intact condition, followed by destabilization through a lateral discectomy at L2-L3 and L4-L5. Specimens were then reconstructed at both operative segments in the following sequence: (1) lateral interbody cage placement; (2) either Discovery facet screws or the Viper F2 system using a transfacet-pedicular trajectory randomized to L2-L3 or L4-L5; and (3) removal of facet screw fixation followed by placement of bilateral pedicle screw instrumentation. Acute range of motion (ROM) was quantified and analyzed.Results:All 4 reconstruction groups, including stand-alone interbody cage placement, bilateral Discovery facet screws, the Viper F2 system, and bilateral pedicle screw-rod stabilization, resulted in a significant decrease in acute ROM in all loading modes tested (P<0.05). There were no significant differences observed between the 4 instrumentation groups (P>0.05). Although not statistically significant, the Viper F2 system resulted in greatest reduction of acute ROM in both flexion-extension and axial rotation versus all other treatments (P>0.05).Conclusions:Stand-alone interbody cage placement results in a significant reduction in acute ROM at the operative segment in the absence of posterior supplemental fixation. If added fixation is desired, facet screw placement, including the Viper F2 facet screw system using an integrated compression washer and transfacet-pedicular trajectory, provides similar acute stability to the spinal segment compared with traditional bilateral pedicle screw fixation in the setting of lateral interbody cage deployment.
引用
收藏
页码:E336 / E343
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [21] Finite Element Analysis Comparing the Biomechanical Parameters in Multilevel Posterior Cervical Instrumentation Model Involving Lateral Mass Screw versus Transpedicular Screw Fixation at the C7 Vertebra
    Kulkarni, Arvind Gopalrao
    Kumar, Priyambada
    Shetty, Gautam Manjayya
    Roy, Sandipan
    Manickam, Pechimuthu Susai
    Dhason, Raja
    Chadalavada, Aditya Raghavendra Sai Siva
    Adbalwad, Yogesh Madhavrao
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2024,
  • [22] Biomechanical effects of posterior pedicle screw-based instrumentation using titanium versus carbon fiber reinforced PEEK in an osteoporotic spine human cadaver model
    Oikonomidis, Stavros
    Greven, Johannes
    Bredow, Jan
    Eh, Madita
    Prescher, Andreas
    Fischer, Horst
    Thuering, Johannes
    Eysel, Peer
    Hildebrand, Frank
    Kobbe, Philipp
    Scheyerer, Max Joseph
    Herren, Christian
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2020, 80