Temporal Discounting of Tornado Shelter-Seeking Intentions Amidst Standard and Impact-Based Weather Alerts: A Crowdsourced Experiment

被引:9
作者
Gelino, Brett W. [1 ,2 ]
Reed, Derek D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Dept Appl Behav Sci, 1000 Sunnyside Ave,Room 4048, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[2] Cofrin Logan Ctr Addict Res & Treatment, Lawrence, KS USA
关键词
delay discounting; impact-based wording; severe weather alert; shelter-seeking; tornado; HYPOTHETICAL REWARDS; POTENTIALLY REAL; DELAY; CHOICE; BEHAVIOR; PROBABILITY; EQUIVALENCE; RELIABILITY; WARNINGS; SUBJECT;
D O I
10.1037/xap0000246
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Tornadoes are atmospheric events capable of massive devastation, involving physical destruction and human casualties. Following the 2011 Joplin. MO tornado that claimed the lives of nearly 160 people, the National Weather Service and National Institute of Standards and Technology concluded that better warning systems would have saved lives. This conclusion prompted the creation of impact-based warning (IBW) messages that use explicit language to convey damage threats and potential outcomes. The current study examined the efficacy of impact-based warnings for evoking shelter-seeking intentions in a simulated tornado event. We stratified participants recruited through a crowdsourcing service into 1 of 4 simulated tornado warning conditions, varying with respect to the content and description (IBW) provided. Participants rated their likelihood of immediate shelter-seeking given increasing lead times to the potential tornado strike. Analyses indicated that participants receiving IBW maintained shelter-seeking most across increasing delays. Results suggest viable warning delivery at longer lead times when employing IBW, thereby providing more preparation while bypassing risks of delay-induced inaction.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 25
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Is Talk "Cheap"? An Initial Investigation of the Equivalence of Alcohol Purchase Task Performance for Hypothetical and Actual Rewards
    Amlung, Michael T.
    Acker, John
    Stojek, Monika K.
    Murphy, James G.
    MacKillop, James
    [J]. ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2012, 36 (04) : 716 - 724
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2017, Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEA)
  • [3] Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk
    Berinsky, Adam J.
    Huber, Gregory A.
    Lenz, Gabriel S.
    [J]. POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2012, 20 (03) : 351 - 368
  • [4] Congruence of BOLD Response across Intertemporal Choice Conditions: Fictive and Real Money Gains and Losses
    Bickel, Warren K.
    Pitcock, Jeffery A.
    Yi, Richard
    Angtuaco, Edgardo J. C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 29 (27) : 8839 - 8846
  • [5] Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: delay discounting in current, never, and ex-smokers
    Bickel, WK
    Odum, AL
    Madden, GJ
    [J]. PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1999, 146 (04) : 447 - 454
  • [6] Communicating Increased Risk: An Empirical Investigation of the National Weather Service's Impact-Based Warnings
    Casteel, Mark A.
    [J]. WEATHER CLIMATE AND SOCIETY, 2016, 8 (03) : 219 - 232
  • [7] Out of sight is not out of mind: The impact of restricting wireless mobile device use on anxiety levels among low, moderate and high users
    Cheever, Nancy A.
    Rosen, Larry D.
    Carrier, L. Mark
    Chavez, Amber
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2014, 37 : 290 - 297
  • [8] What Are We Doing When We Translate from Quantitative Models?
    Critchfield, Thomas S.
    Reed, Derek D.
    [J]. BEHAVIOR ANALYST, 2009, 32 (02): : 339 - 362
  • [9] Cross-cultural comparisons of discounting delayed and probabilistic rewards
    Du, WJ
    Green, L
    Myerson, J
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL RECORD, 2002, 52 (04) : 479 - 492
  • [10] Food reinforcement, delay discounting and obesity
    Epstein, Leonard H.
    Salvy, Sarah J.
    Carr, Katelyn A.
    Dearing, Kelly K.
    Bickel, Warren K.
    [J]. PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 2010, 100 (05) : 438 - 445