A Taxonomy of Transparency in Science

被引:50
作者
Elliott, Kevin C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Lyman Briggs Coll, Dept Fisheries & Wildlife, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Philosophy, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
open science; transparency; values and science; value judgments; science communication; research ethics; ETHICS; COMMUNICATION; VALUES; POLICY;
D O I
10.1017/can.2020.21
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
Both scientists and philosophers of science have recently emphasized the importance of promoting transparency in science. For scientists, transparency is a way to promote reproducibility, progress, and trust in research. For philosophers of science, transparency can help address the value-ladenness of scientific research in a responsible way. Nevertheless, the concept of transparency is a complex one. Scientists can be transparent about many different things, for many different reasons, on behalf of many different stakeholders. This paper proposes a taxonomy that clarifies the major dimensions along which approaches to transparency can vary. By doing so, it provides several insights that philosophers and other science studies scholars can pursue. In particular, it helps address common objections to pursuing transparency in science, it clarifies major forms of transparency, and it suggests avenues for further research on this topic.
引用
收藏
页码:342 / 355
页数:14
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
Angler M.W., 2017, Science journalism: an introduction
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, COMMODIFICATION ACAD
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Earth Science Satellite Applications: Current and Future Prospects, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-33438-7_5
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Science as an Open Enterprise
[5]   The Challenges of Sharing Data in an Era of Politicized Science [J].
Bauchner, Howard ;
Fontanarosa, Phil B. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2019, 322 (23) :2290-2291
[6]   In defence of the value free ideal [J].
Betz, Gregor .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL FOR PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2013, 3 (02) :207-220
[7]  
Biddle J., 2010, New Waves in Philosophy of Science, P172
[8]   Institutionalizing Dissent: A Proposal for an Adversarial System of Pharmaceutical Research [J].
Biddle, Justin .
KENNEDY INSTITUTE OF ETHICS JOURNAL, 2013, 23 (04) :325-353
[9]   On Predicting Recidivism: Epistemic Risk, Tradeoffs, and Values in Machine Learning [J].
Biddle, Justin B. .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2022, 52 (03) :321-341
[10]   "Antiscience Zealotry"? Values, Epistemic Risk, and the GMO Debate [J].
Biddle, Justin B. .
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2018, 85 (03) :360-379