Coronary calcification at electron-beam CT: Effect of section thickness on calcium scoring in vitro and in vivo

PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of electron-beam computed tomography (CT) with 3.0- and 1.5-mm section thickness for calcium quantification and the prevalence of coronary calcifications with each. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Electron-beam CT images were acquired with nonoverlapping 1.5- and 3.0-mm section thickness. Scans were obtained in an anthropomorphic thorax phantom with calcium cylinders of different sizes and densities, as well as in 1,302 study participants. A calcified lesion was defined as a minimum of 2 pixels (area, 0.52 mm(2)) with a minimum attenuation of 130 HU. The calcified lesions were quantified by means of a volumetric method with isotropic interpolation. From the phantom scans mean volume scores, SDs, and measurement variations were calculated. From the participant scans, median volume scores and interquartile ranges were calculated. Participants were classified in categories based on cutoff levels for volume score quartiles for the 1.5-mm scans. An intraclass correlation coefficient (K value) was calculated as a measure of correlation between categories. RESULTS: In the phantom, deviations of calculated volumes from the true cylinder volumes and measurement variations were generally higher for the 3.0-mm protocol than for the 1.5-mm protocol. In the participants, the median volume score was 100 mm(3) (interquartile range, 11-409 mm(3)) for the 3.0-mm protocol and 144 mm(3) (interquartile range, 35-513 mm(3)) for the 1.5-mm protocol. Agreement between classifications of volume scores for the 1.5- and 3.0-mm scans was good (K = 0.62, P <.001). Compared with the quartile classification for the 1.5-mm scan, however, classifications for 370 (28%) participants were put in a different category with the 3.0-mm protocol. CONCLUSION: In a phantom, electron-beam CT scans with 3.0-mm section thickness yield less accurate estimates of calcified volume than do 1.5-mm scans. Electron-beam CT protocols with thinner sections considerably affect classification of individuals on the basis of the amount of coronary calcification depicted. (C) RSNA, 2003.