Survivorship care plan (SCP) : The viewpoints of women with breast cancer and their general practitioners

被引:1
作者
Ladaique, A. F. [1 ]
Desandes, E. [2 ]
Salleron, J. [3 ]
Di Patrizio, P. [4 ]
Marchal, F. [5 ]
Vogin, G. [6 ]
Lesur, A. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lorraine, Nancy Fac Med, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
[2] Lorraine Inst Cancerol, Hlth Data Collect Serv, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
[3] Lorraine Inst Cancerol, Data Biostat Cell, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
[4] Univ Lorraine, Gen Med Dept, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
[5] Lorraine Inst Cancerol, Surg Unit, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
[6] Natl Radiotherapy Ctr Luxembourg, Francois Baclesse Ctr, Struct Funct Maturat, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
[7] Lorraine Inst Cancerol, Breast Care Pathway, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
来源
REVUE D EPIDEMIOLOGIE ET DE SANTE PUBLIQUE | 2021年 / 69卷 / 05期
关键词
Breast cancer; Pathway; General practitioner; Survivorship care plan; OUTCOMES; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.respe.2021.07.001
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background. - The French National Cancer Institute recommends the use of survivorship care plans (SCP) for all cancer survivors. Developing useful SCP's requires understanding of what survivors and their providers need and how SCP's can be implemented in practice. We conducted a study to assess the delivery of SCP comprehensive binders for breast cancer women (BCW) and their general practitioners (GP) in a Cancer center from January 2019. Methods. - SCP binders, containing a full range of information on topics related to post-cancer care to survivor-specific information and referrals, were given to BCW during a post-treatment dedicated consultation. Then a letter, containing the treatment summary and 5-year follow-up schedule, was sent to their GPs. Comprehensive binder delivery assessment was carried out using item checkbox, and anonymous open-answered, self-reported questionnaires were sent by email to BCW and their GPs. Results. - The questionnaire response rates were 81.3% for BCW (n = 109/134) and 48.6% for their GPs (n = 52/107). Most BCW (85%) reported that SCP binders provided useful and comprehensive information. However, some of them (18%) felt abandoned and anonymous during the post-treatment follow-up. Most GPs found SCP letters from our anti-cancer center physicians to be useful for their patients, 38% of them had used this information to assure transition of care with other care providers. In addition, GPs were unanimous to express their feeling that this SCP could improve the long-term surveillance of BCW. There was a high concordance between BCW survivors' and PCP' answers, especially regarding SCPs as a communication bridge between GPs and BCW survivors. Response results concerning use of the binders: to talk about them: 59% for BCW vs. 51% for GPs, and to show them: 35% for BCW vs. 31% for GPs. Conclusion. - The opinions of BCW survivors' and PCP' opinions about the use of SCP's by our Cancer Center seems to be favourable. It is essential to implement and develop SCP's as a key tool in long-term surveillance and support for cancer patient survivors and they are a useful instrument for care providers in communication and transition. (C) 2021 ElsevierMasson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 285
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   A cross-sectional population-based survey looking at the impact of cancer survivorship care plans on meeting the needs of cancer survivors in the posttreatment stage [J].
Chahine, Soleil ;
Urquhart, Robin .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2019, 27 (10) :3785-3792
[2]  
Direction de la Recherche des Etudes de l'Evaluation et des Statistiques (Drees), 2017, SUIV PAT ATT CANC GE, P1034
[3]   Failing,to plan is planning to fail: Improving the quality of care with survivorship care plans [J].
Earle, Craig C. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (32) :5112-5116
[4]   Long term care planning for cancer survivors: A health -services research agenda [J].
Earle C.C. .
Journal of Cancer Survivorship: Research and Practice, 2007, 1 (1) :64-74
[5]   Structuring survivorship care: discipline-specific clinician perspectives [J].
Gage, Elizabeth A. ;
Pailler, Megan ;
Zevon, Michael A. ;
Ch'ng, James ;
Groman, Adrienne ;
Kelly, Maureen ;
Panagakis, Christina ;
Wilding, Gregory E. ;
Yasko, Joyce ;
Gruber, Marcia .
JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP, 2011, 5 (03) :217-225
[6]   A teachable moment for oncologists: Cancer survivors, 10 million strong and growing! [J].
Ganz, PA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (24) :5458-5460
[7]   Breast Cancer Survivorship: Why, What and When? [J].
Gass, Jennifer ;
Dupree, Beth ;
Pruthi, Sandhya ;
Radford, Diane ;
Wapnir, Irene ;
Antoszewska, Reza ;
Curtis, Audrey ;
Johnson, Nathalie .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 23 (10) :3162-3167
[8]   Evaluation of effectiveness of survivorship programmes: how to measure success? [J].
Halpern, Michael T. ;
Argenbright, Keith E. .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2017, 18 (01) :E51-E59
[9]  
Institut National du cancer, PROP MIS PLAC PROGR
[10]  
Institut National du cancer, REC OUT AID PRAT