Analysis of companies' digital maturity by hesitant fuzzy linguistic MCDM methods

被引:33
作者
Buyukozkan, Gulcin [1 ]
Guler, Merve [1 ]
机构
[1] Galatasaray Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Ciragan Caddesi 36, TR-34349 Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Digital maturity; hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets; multi criteria decision making; AHP; ARAS; ARAS METHOD; MODEL; SELECTION; VIKOR; EXTENSION;
D O I
10.3233/JIFS-179473
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Digital Transformation (DT) is the journey of using digital technologies to develop new business models and strategies. DT aims to achieve competitive advantage and to realize activities that will create efficiency in the corporate value chain. Digital Maturity Model (DMM) provides a practical approach to DT. There is a need for an analytical tool to analyze the significance of the factors in the DMM and to rank the companies according to their digital maturity. It is a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem with multiple factors under vagueness and impreciseness. Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets (HFLTS) is a technique used to facilitate Decision Makers' (DMs) judgment process in imprecise situations. HFLTS technique gives DMs possibility to use linguistic expressions with comparative judgments. This article introduces a decision framework based on the HFLTS, Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic (HFL) Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and HFL Additive Ratio ASsessment (ARAS) methods. It is aimed to provide a scientific method that helps to determine the most important criteria for companies' DMM and to rank companies. A case study about the banking sector is presented to verify the usability of this method.
引用
收藏
页码:1119 / 1132
页数:14
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] Hesitant fuzzy pairwise comparison for software cost estimation: a case study in Turkey
    Basar, Ayfer
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2017, 25 (04) : 2897 - 2909
  • [2] TOPSIS for Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets
    Beg, Ismat
    Rashid, Tabasam
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2013, 28 (12) : 1162 - 1171
  • [3] Berghaus S., 2016, MCIS CYPRUS, V22
  • [4] Bolturk E., 2016, International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, V8, P271, DOI DOI 10.13033/IJAHP.V8I2.387
  • [5] A novel renewable energy selection model for United Nations' sustainable development goals
    Buyukozkan, Gulcin
    Karabulut, Yagmur
    Mukul, Esin
    [J]. ENERGY, 2018, 165 : 290 - 302
  • [6] An extension of ARAS methodology under Interval Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy environment for Digital Supply Chain
    Buyukozkan, Gulcin
    Gocer, Fethullah
    [J]. APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2018, 69 : 634 - 654
  • [7] Prioritization of renewable energy alternatives by using an integrated fuzzy MCDM model: A real case application for Turkey
    Colak, Murat
    Kaya, Ihsan
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 80 : 840 - 853
  • [8] Contextualizing the outcome of a maturity assessment for Industry 4.0
    Colli, M.
    Madsen, O.
    Berger, U.
    Moller, C.
    Waehrens, B. Vejrum
    Bockholt, M.
    [J]. IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2018, 51 (11): : 1347 - 1352
  • [9] Danjou C., 2017, CIGI
  • [10] De Bruin T., 2005, AUSTRALASIAN C INFOR