G-CSF primary prophylaxis use and outcomes in patients receiving chemotherapy at intermediate risk for febrile neutropenia: a scoping review

被引:7
作者
Campbell, Kim [1 ]
Chadha, Nidhi [2 ]
Dimri, Seema [2 ]
Wang, Weijia [3 ]
Li, Edward [1 ]
机构
[1] Sandoz Inc, Oncol Med Affairs, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA
[2] Novartis Healthcare Pvt Ltd, Value & Access, Hyderabad, India
[3] Novartis Pharmaceut, Hlth Econ & Outcomes Res, E Hanover, NJ USA
关键词
G-CSF; primary prophylaxis; intermediate FN risk; real-world; prophylaxis patterns; FN incidence; COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR; BREAST-CANCER PATIENTS; NON-HODGKIN-LYMPHOMA; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; REAL-WORLD; FEC-D; PEGFILGRASTIM PROPHYLAXIS; GROWTH-FACTORS; SINGLE-CENTER; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/17474086.2022.2093712
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a major dose-limiting toxicity of myelosuppressive chemotherapy, and several patients receiving chemotherapy are at intermediate risk of developing FN. However, the guidelines remain less clear regarding the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) for this population and insights about real-world prophylaxis patterns and FN outcomes are needed. Areas covered This scoping review summarizes the variability in real-world G-CSF prophylaxis treatment patterns, incidence of FN, and associated outcomes among patients receiving chemotherapy at intermediate risk of FN. G-CSF PP use varied across the included studies (N = 23). Overall, there was a trend for reduced FN incidence among patients who received G-CSF PP vs. those who did not. G-CSF PP was also associated with a lower incidence of FN-related dose delays and reductions and fewer hospitalization days. Gaps in the literature of real-world studies exist, particularly around incorporating FN risk factor assessment, patient-reported outcomes, and health economic outcomes. Expert opinion Further studies are warranted to determine the impact of G-CSF PP use on clinical, quality of life, and economic outcomes in patients with intermediate FN risk, which could optimize care for this subgroup of patients, resulting in better population-based FN-related outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:619 / 633
页数:15
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [1] 2010 update of EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphoproliferative disorders and solid tumours
    Aapro, M. S.
    Bohlius, J.
    Cameron, D. A.
    Dal Lago, Lissandra
    Donnelly, J. Peter
    Kearney, N.
    Lyman, G. H.
    Pettengell, R.
    Tjan-Heijnen, V. C.
    Walewski, J.
    Weber, Damien C.
    Zielinski, C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 47 (01) : 8 - 32
  • [2] Chemotherapy-induced (febrile) neutropenia prophylaxis with biosimilar filgrastim in elderly versus non-elderly cancer patients: Patterns, outcomes, and determinants (MONITOR-GCSF study)
    Aapro, Matti
    Bokemeyer, Carsten
    Ludwig, Heinz
    Gascon, Pere
    Boccadoro, Mario
    Denhaerynck, Kris
    Gorray, Michael
    Krendyukov, Andriy
    MacDonald, Karen
    Abraham, Ivo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 8 (02) : 86 - 95
  • [3] Risk of Neutropenia-Related Hospitalization in Patients Who Received Colony-Stimulating Factors With Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer
    Agiro, Abiy
    Ma, Qinli
    Acheson, Anupama Kurup
    Wu, Sze-Jung
    Patt, Debra A.
    Barron, John J.
    Malin, Jennifer L.
    Rosenberg, Alan
    Schilsky, Richard L.
    Lyman, Gary H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (32) : 3872 - +
  • [4] Real-world impact of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor on febrile neutropenia
    Altwairgi, A. K.
    Hopman, W. M.
    Mates, M.
    [J]. CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2013, 20 (03) : E171 - E179
  • [5] American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), COVID 19 PAT CAR INF
  • [6] Incidence of febrile neutropenia in early stage breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant FEC-D treatment
    Assi, Hazem
    Murray, Joshua
    Boyle, Laura
    Rayson, Daniel
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2014, 22 (12) : 3227 - 3234
  • [7] Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with metastatic cancer not receiving granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis in US clinical practice
    Averin, Ahuva
    Silvia, Amanda
    Lamerato, Lois
    Richert-Boe, Kathryn
    Kaur, Manpreet
    Sundaresan, Devi
    Shah, Neel
    Hatfield, Mark
    Lawrence, Tatiana
    Lyman, Gary H.
    Weycker, Derek
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2021, 29 (04) : 2179 - 2186
  • [8] Appropriateness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in patients receiving chemotherapy by febrile neutropenia risk level
    Baig, Hassam
    Somlo, Barbara
    Eisen, Melissa
    Stryker, Scott
    Bensink, Mark
    Morrow, Phuong K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2019, 25 (07) : 1576 - 1585
  • [9] Incidence, cost, and mortality of neutropenia hospitalization associated with chemotherapy
    Caggiano, V
    Weiss, RV
    Rickert, TS
    Linde-Zwirble, WT
    [J]. CANCER, 2005, 103 (09) : 1916 - 1924
  • [10] Neutropenia management in patients receiving myelosuppressive polychemotherapy for early breast cancer in Belgium: BRONS study results
    Catala, Gaetan
    Mebis, Jeroen
    Jerusalem, Guy
    Verhoeven, Didier
    Awada, Ahmad
    Bols, Alain
    Somers, Luc
    Van den Broeck, Anke
    Duhoux, Francois P.
    Machiels, Jean-Pascal
    [J]. ACTA CLINICA BELGICA, 2020, 75 (02) : 128 - 135