Defense Contractors, Private Equity Firms, and US National Security

被引:2
作者
Mahoney, Charles W. [1 ]
Tkach, Benjamin K. [2 ]
Rethmeyer, Craig J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Calif State Univ Long Beach, Long Beach, CA 90840 USA
[2] Mississippi State Univ, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
关键词
defense; contractors; privatization; outsourcing; private equity; United States; defense budget; <bold>Mots cles</bold>; entreprises du secteur de la defense; privatisation; sous-traitance; capital-investissement; etats-unis; budget de la defense; <bold>Palabras clave</bold>; contratistas de defensa; privatizacion; externalizacion; capital privado; estados unidos; presupuesto de defensa; BUYOUTS;
D O I
10.1093/jogss/ogac018
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
Private equity firms have become important financial actors in the US defense industry in recent years-acquiring over 500 defense contractors since the early 2000s. This inquiry describes how increased capital flows into private equity funds, rising national security budgets, Pentagon policy, and rapid industry consolidation have spurred private equity investment in the businesses of American defense. Subsequently, the study demonstrates two ways private equity acquisitions of corporations in the defense industry affect US national security. First, because private equity firms often fund acquisitions through leveraged buyouts, the debt obligations of private equity-owned defense contractors are characterized by a relatively high risk of credit default. Second, the debt burden private equity firms place on defense contractors often reduces these companies' free cash flow. As an increasing number of defense contractors are acquired by private equity firms, aggregate corporate reinvestment in the defense industry may well decline, thus diminishing the ability of contractors to perform their national security obligations. entreprises du secteur de la defense societes de capital-investissement et securite nationale aux etats-unis
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Private Equity Acquisitions of Continental European Firms: the Impact of Ownership and Control on the Likelihood of Being Taken Private [J].
Achleitner, Ann-Kristin ;
Betzer, Andre ;
Goergen, Marc ;
Hinterramskogler, Bastian .
EUROPEAN FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2013, 19 (01) :72-107
[32]   Private equity firms and management control: the framing of shareholder-oriented practices [J].
Andrea Dello Sbarba ;
Riccardo Giannetti ;
Alessandro Marelli .
Journal of Management and Governance, 2020, 24 :953-987
[33]   Non-bank finance for firms: the role of private equity funds in Italy [J].
Daniele Coin ;
Valerio Vacca .
Empirical Economics, 2016, 51 :221-243
[34]   Difficulties and risks of interSME cooperation : solutions provided by private-equity firms [J].
Burkhardt, Kirsten .
REVUE INTERNATIONALE PME, 2016, 29 (3-4) :73-107
[35]   Private equity investment in family firms: the role of stake size and deal syndication [J].
Dawson, Alexandra ;
Barredy, Celine .
VENTURE CAPITAL, 2018, 20 (04) :355-376
[36]   Do private equity target firms exhibit less effectual governance structures? [J].
Clarkson, Peter M. ;
Pathan, Shams ;
Tellam, Andrew .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2016, 41 (02) :244-270
[37]   An analysis of the management practices of Brazilian private equity firms and their impact on company performance [J].
Egydio, Luiz ;
Rossi, Malamud ;
Martelanc, Roy .
VENTURE CAPITAL, 2013, 15 (02) :151-172
[38]   Investor activism strategies of private equity firms: evidence from continental Europe [J].
Berezinets, Irina ;
Ilina, Yulia .
STUDIES IN ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2022, 39 (02) :193-218
[39]   Non-bank finance for firms: the role of private equity funds in Italy [J].
Coin, Daniele ;
Vacca, Valerio .
EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 51 (01) :221-243
[40]   Signaling through private equity placements and its impact on the valuation of biotechnology firms [J].
Janney, JJ ;
Folta, TB .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2003, 18 (03) :361-380