Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria

被引:6699
作者
Nowell, Lorelli S. [1 ]
Norris, Jill M. [1 ]
White, Deborah E. [1 ]
Moules, Nancy J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Fac Nursing, 2500 Univ Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS | 2017年 / 16卷 / 01期
关键词
qualitative methods; qualitative data analysis; rigor; thematic analysis; trustworthiness; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RIGOUR; FOCUS;
D O I
10.1177/1609406917733847
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
As qualitative research becomes increasingly recognized and valued, it is imperative that it is conducted in a rigorous and methodical manner to yield meaningful and useful results. To be accepted as trustworthy, qualitative researchers must demonstrate that data analysis has been conducted in a precise, consistent, and exhaustive manner through recording, systematizing, and disclosing the methods of analysis with enough detail to enable the reader to determine whether the process is credible. Although there are numerous examples of how to conduct qualitative research, few sophisticated tools are available to researchers for conducting a rigorous and relevant thematic analysis. The purpose of this article is to guide researchers using thematic analysis as a research method. We offer personal insights and practical examples, while exploring issues of rigor and trustworthiness. The process of conducting a thematic analysis is illustrated through the presentation of an auditable decision trail, guiding interpreting and representing textual data. We detail our step-by-step approach to exploring the effectiveness of strategic clinical networks in Alberta, Canada, in our mixed methods case study. This article contributes a purposeful approach to thematic analysis in order to systematize and increase the traceability and verification of the analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2004, ESSENTIAL GUIDE QUAL
  • [2] [Anonymous], THESIS
  • [3] Aronson J., 1995, The qualitative report, V2, P1, DOI [10.46743/2160-3715/1995.2069, DOI 10.46743/2160-3715/1995.2069]
  • [4] Attride-Stirling J., 2001, Qualitative Research, V1, P385, DOI [DOI 10.1177/146879410100100307, 10.1177/146879410100100307]
  • [5] Boyatzis R., 1998, TRANSFORMING QUALITA
  • [6] Braun V., 2011, Qualitative Research in Psychology, V3, P77, DOI DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA
  • [7] Appraising qualitative research articles in medicine and medical education
    Côté, L
    Turgeon, J
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2005, 27 (01) : 71 - 75
  • [8] Crabtree BF, 1999, Doing qualitative research
  • [9] Creswell J., 2009, Research design. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, V3rd ed
  • [10] Creswell J., 2007, Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, V2nd, P179